Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DMRC vs IPGP vs FORM vs ONTO vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
DMRC vs IPGP vs FORM vs ONTO vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $188M | $4.31B | $11.28B | $13.63B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $34M | $1.04B | $840M | $1.03B | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $29M | $68M | $106M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 37.6% | 42.1% | 48.8% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -94.4% | 0.3% | 12.7% | 10.0% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 62.6x | 66.5x | 38.7x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $0.00 | $45M | $17M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $404M | $103M | $346M | $675M |
DMRC vs IPGP vs FORM vs ONTO vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) | 100 | 49.9 | -50.1% |
| IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP) | 100 | 65.4 | -34.6% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 574.8 | +474.8% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 881.7 | +781.7% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DMRC vs IPGP vs FORM vs ONTO vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, DMRC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IPGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.80
- Lower volatility, beta 1.80, current ratio 6.08x
- Beta 1.80, current ratio 6.08x
- Beta 1.80 vs ONTO's 2.66
FORM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 19.5% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
- +387.8% vs DMRC's -33.4%
- 5.6% ROA vs DMRC's -54.8%, ROIC 5.4% vs -53.6%
ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 10.3% margin vs DMRC's -95.3%
MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 9.6% revenue growth vs DMRC's -11.7%
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 38.7x)
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs DMRC's -11.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 38.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs DMRC's -95.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.80 vs ONTO's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +387.8% vs DMRC's -33.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs DMRC's -54.8%, ROIC 5.4% vs -53.6% |
DMRC vs IPGP vs FORM vs ONTO vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DMRC vs IPGP vs FORM vs ONTO vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MKSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
FORM leads 1 • IPGP leads 1 • DMRC leads 0 • ONTO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FORM and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 120.1x DMRC's $34M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DMRC's -95.3%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $34M | $1.0B | $840M | $1.0B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $55M | $152M | $158M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $29M | $68M | $106M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $8M | -$5M | $239M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +37.6% | +42.1% | +48.8% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -94.4% | +0.3% | +12.7% | +10.0% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -95.3% | +2.8% | +8.1% | +10.3% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | +0.8% | -0.6% | +23.2% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +16.6% | +32.0% | +9.5% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | -54.4% | +2.2% | -48.5% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 67% valuation discount to FORM's 209.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKSI's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FORM's 100.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $188M | $4.3B | $11.3B | $13.6B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $182M | $3.9B | $11.2B | $13.3B | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.76x | 139.22x | 209.68x | 98.57x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 62.62x | 66.48x | 38.74x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 48.90x | 100.94x | 68.79x | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.54x | 4.30x | 14.37x | 13.56x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.62x | 2.04x | 10.94x | 6.43x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 960.69x | 45.47x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-73 for DMRC. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPGP scores 6/9 vs DMRC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -72.6% | +1.4% | +6.7% | +5.2% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.8% | +1.2% | +5.6% | +4.7% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -53.6% | +0.6% | +5.4% | +5.7% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.6% | +0.6% | +6.1% | +6.5% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | — | 0.04x | 0.01x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$404M | -$58M | -$329M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $404M | $103M | $346M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $0 | $45M | $17M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 252.69x | — | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,803 for DMRC. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +387.8% total return vs DMRC's -33.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 72.9% vs DMRC's -24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.8% | +35.8% | +144.4% | +65.2% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.4% | +75.6% | +387.8% | +118.9% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.6% | -12.7% | +417.3% | +218.0% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.0% | -48.5% | +273.9% | +312.6% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | +20.2% | +1952.2% | +1431.7% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.3% | -4.4% | +72.9% | +47.1% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IPGP and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPGP is the less volatile stock with a 1.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKSI currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs DMRC's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.50x | 1.80x | 2.02x | 2.66x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.64 | $155.82 | $159.09 | $315.86 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.07 | $53.98 | $26.08 | $85.88 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +65.2% | +90.9% | +86.8% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 39.7 | 66.5 | 61.0 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 222K | 510K | 1.6M | 832K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DMRC as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", ONTO as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 179.7% upside for DMRC (target: $24) vs -14.7% for FORM (target: $123). MKSI is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $151.67 | $123.38 | $308.33 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 27 | 19 | 11 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.3% | +0.2% | +0.6% | +0.2% |
MKSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FORM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
DMRC vs IPGP vs FORM vs ONTO vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 7% for Digimarc Corporation (DMRC). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 209. 7x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to -72. 0% for Digimarc Corporation (DMRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1952% versus DMRC's -70. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
80β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ONTO is approximately 48% more volatile than IPGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -11. 7% for Digimarc Corporation (DMRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DMRC leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -95. 3% for Digimarc Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -94. 4% for DMRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DMRC leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 66. 5x for FormFactor, Inc. — 36. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DMRC: 179. 7% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. DMRC, IPGP, FORM, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DMRC or IPGP or FORM or ONTO or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1952% 10Y return). Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FORM: +1952%, DMRC: -70. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DMRC and IPGP and FORM and ONTO and MKSI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.