Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DNTH vs ALXO vs BCAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
DNTH vs ALXO vs BCAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3.19B | $82M | $4M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-89M | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | — | 106.0% |
| Operating Margin | -143.2% | — | -25.2% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $5M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $16M | $7M |
DNTH vs ALXO vs BCAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dianthus Therapeuti… (DNTH) | 100 | 60.9 | -39.1% |
| ALX Oncology Holdin… (ALXO) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DNTH vs ALXO vs BCAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DNTH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -67.3%, EPS growth -64.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -31.8%
- -67.1% 10Y total return vs ALXO's -94.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 13.32x
ALXO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and quality.
- 31.7% revenue growth vs BCAB's -81.8%
- 4.0% margin vs BCAB's -25.3%
BCAB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 0.36
- Beta 0.36 vs ALXO's 1.49
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.7% revenue growth vs BCAB's -81.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs BCAB's -25.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs ALXO's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +321.9% vs BCAB's -84.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs BCAB's -309.4% |
DNTH vs ALXO vs BCAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DNTH vs ALXO vs BCAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DNTH leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCAB leads 1 • ALXO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAB and ALXO operate at a comparable scale, with $2M and $0 in trailing revenue. DNTH is the more profitable business, keeping -8.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCAB's -25.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$191M | -$91M | -$51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$89M | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$130M | -$78M | -$23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | — | +106.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.2% | — | -25.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | — | -25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -97.7% | — | -11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.2% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +43.1% | +67.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DNTH and ALXO and BCAB each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $82M | $4M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $71M | $4M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.20x | -0.80x | -0.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1567.68x | — | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.86x | 3.14x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DNTH leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DNTH delivers a -1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-124 for ALXO. DNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALXO's 0.20x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.8% | -124.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | -85.6% | -3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.4% | -122.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.6% | -127.0% | -4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.20x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$50M | -$11M | -$918,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $16M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $5M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -58.09x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DNTH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DNTH five years ago would be worth $4,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14 for BCAB. Over the past 12 months, DNTH leads with a +321.9% total return vs BCAB's -84.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DNTH at 89.0% vs BCAB's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +92.7% | +32.2% | -86.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +321.9% | +177.1% | -84.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.8% | -82.6% | -98.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | -97.5% | -99.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.1% | -94.9% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +89.0% | -44.2% | -73.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DNTH and BCAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALXO's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DNTH currently trades 79.2% from its 52-week high vs BCAB's 5.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.49x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.50 | $2.66 | $71.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.64 | $0.40 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +57.1% | +5.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.8 | 27.9 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 674K | 1.1M | 44K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DNTH as "Buy", ALXO as "Buy", BCAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6922.5% upside for BCAB (target: $250) vs 46.4% for DNTH (target: $112).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.91 | $4.00 | $250.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DNTH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BCAB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
DNTH vs ALXO vs BCAB: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DNTH or ALXO or BCAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.
(DNTH) is the stronger pick with -67. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -81. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). Analysts rate Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DNTH or ALXO or BCAB?
Over the past 5 years, Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.
(DNTH) delivered a total return of -58. 7%, compared to -99. 9% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DNTH returned -67. 1% versus BCAB's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DNTH or ALXO or BCAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus ALX Oncology Holdings Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning ALXO is approximately 312% more volatile than BCAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 20% for ALX Oncology Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DNTH or ALXO or BCAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.
(DNTH) is pulling ahead at -67. 3% versus -81. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BioAtla, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DNTH or ALXO or BCAB?
ALX Oncology Holdings Inc.
(ALXO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -79. 7% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALXO leads at 0. 0% versus -87. 4% for DNTH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DNTH leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DNTH or ALXO or BCAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is DNTH or ALXO or BCAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAB: -99. 8%, ALXO: -94. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DNTH and ALXO and BCAB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.