Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DOCN vs FSLY vs NET vs AKAM vs BAND

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DOCN
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$15.72B
5Y Perf.+257.4%
FSLY
Fastly, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.-71.0%
NET
Cloudflare, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$90.83B
5Y Perf.+265.9%
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17.18B
5Y Perf.+14.5%
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.-61.6%

DOCN vs FSLY vs NET vs AKAM vs BAND — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DOCN logoDOCN
FSLY logoFSLY
NET logoNET
AKAM logoAKAM
BAND logoBAND
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$15.72B$3.05B$90.83B$17.18B$1.56B
Revenue (TTM)$949M$653M$2.33B$4.27B$209.36B
Net Income (TTM)$254M$-103M$-87M$435M$4.11B
Gross Margin58.5%58.7%73.5%57.2%37.3%
Operating Margin16.4%-15.9%-9.1%13.7%-2.2%
Forward P/E147.2x73.1x228.9x17.0x27.4x
Total Debt$731M$430M$3.70B$6.91B$701M
Cash & Equiv.$254M$181M$944M$930M$103M

DOCN vs FSLY vs NET vs AKAM vs BANDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DOCN
FSLY
NET
AKAM
BAND
StockMar 21May 26Return
DigitalOcean Holdin… (DOCN)100357.4+257.4%
Fastly, Inc. (FSLY)10029.0-71.0%
Cloudflare, Inc. (NET)100365.9+265.9%
Akamai Technologies… (AKAM)100114.5+14.5%
Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)10038.4-61.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DOCN vs FSLY vs NET vs AKAM vs BAND

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DOCN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Akamai Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. NET also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DOCN
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

DOCN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 183.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
  • 26.8% margin vs FSLY's -15.8%
  • +426.1% vs AKAM's +40.8%
  • 13.0% ROA vs FSLY's -6.9%, ROIC 15.6% vs -7.8%
Best for: growth exposure
FSLY
Fastly, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FSLY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 2.61x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
NET
Cloudflare, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NET ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 13.3% 10Y total return vs DOCN's 254.3%
  • 29.8% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

AKAM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • beta 0.73
  • Beta 0.73, current ratio 2.29x
  • Lower P/E (17.0x vs 228.9x)
  • Beta 0.73 vs DOCN's 2.22
Best for: income & stability and defensive
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BAND doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNET logoNET29.8% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7%
ValueAKAM logoAKAMLower P/E (17.0x vs 228.9x)
Quality / MarginsDOCN logoDOCN26.8% margin vs FSLY's -15.8%
Stability / SafetyAKAM logoAKAMBeta 0.73 vs DOCN's 2.22
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DOCN logoDOCN+426.1% vs AKAM's +40.8%
Efficiency (ROA)DOCN logoDOCN13.0% ROA vs FSLY's -6.9%, ROIC 15.6% vs -7.8%

DOCN vs FSLY vs NET vs AKAM vs BAND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DOCNDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FSLYFastly, Inc.
FY 2025
Network Services
76.6%$478M
Security
20.0%$125M
Other
3.4%$21M
NETCloudflare, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$2.2B
AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$4.2B
BANDBandwidth Inc.
FY 2025
CPaaS, Usage-Based Fees
73.8%$415M
CPaaS, Service Fees
26.2%$147M

DOCN vs FSLY vs NET vs AKAM vs BAND — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDOCNLAGGINGBAND

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DOCN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 320.8x FSLY's $653M. DOCN is the more profitable business, keeping 26.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FSLY's -15.8%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDOCN logoDOCNDigitalOcean Hold…FSLY logoFSLYFastly, Inc.NET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.AKAM logoAKAMAkamai Technologi…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$949M$653M$2.3B$4.3B$209.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$315M-$32M$67M$1.1B-$4.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$254M-$103M-$87M$435M$4.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$38M$59M$365M$765M$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.5%+58.7%+73.5%+57.2%+37.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.4%-15.9%-9.1%+13.7%-2.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.8%-15.8%-3.7%+10.2%+2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.0%+9.0%+15.7%+17.9%+0.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.4%+19.8%+33.5%+5.8%+1197.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-59.5%+51.9%+36.4%-13.4%+39.8%
DOCN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AKAM and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 38.0x trailing earnings, AKAM trades at a 36% valuation discount to DOCN's 59.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AKAM's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NET's 1062.7x.

MetricDOCN logoDOCNDigitalOcean Hold…FSLY logoFSLYFastly, Inc.NET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.AKAM logoAKAMAkamai Technologi…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
Market CapShares × price$15.7B$3.0B$90.8B$17.2B$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16.2B$3.3B$93.6B$23.2B$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS59.75x-23.49x-886.38x38.01x-113.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.147.21x73.12x228.90x17.02x27.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.00x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple54.99x1062.71x17.32x50.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue17.43x4.89x41.90x4.08x2.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.08x61.38x3.45x3.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF92.58x46.38x280.08x24.57x0.02x
Evenly matched — AKAM and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DOCN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DOCN delivers a 165.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $166 in annual profit, vs $-11 for FSLY. FSLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NET's 2.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCN scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDOCN logoDOCNDigitalOcean Hold…FSLY logoFSLYFastly, Inc.NET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.AKAM logoAKAMAkamai Technologi…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+165.7%-10.9%-6.2%+9.1%+4.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.0%-6.9%-1.5%+3.9%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.6%-7.8%-4.6%+4.7%-1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.9%-8.9%-6.6%+6.7%-1.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975353
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.46x2.54x1.39x1.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$476M$250M$2.8B$6.0B$598M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$254M$181M$944M$930M$103M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$731M$430M$3.7B$6.9B$701M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense134.84x-15.29x-10.22x8.85x-10.30x
DOCN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NET five years ago would be worth $35,891 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,872 for BAND. Over the past 12 months, DOCN leads with a +426.1% total return vs AKAM's +40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NET at 77.1% vs AKAM's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDOCN logoDOCNDigitalOcean Hold…FSLY logoFSLYFastly, Inc.NET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.AKAM logoAKAMAkamai Technologi…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+207.5%+91.4%+31.1%+37.1%+242.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+426.1%+223.4%+111.2%+40.8%+253.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+353.4%+56.4%+455.1%+47.1%+330.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+256.0%-53.4%+258.9%+5.3%-61.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+254.3%-18.7%+1328.1%+132.7%+143.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+65.5%+16.1%+77.1%+13.7%+62.7%
NET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NET and AKAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AKAM is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DOCN's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NET currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs FSLY's 56.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDOCN logoDOCNDigitalOcean Hold…FSLY logoFSLYFastly, Inc.NET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.AKAM logoAKAMAkamai Technologi…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.22x0.95x1.53x0.73x1.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$162.00$34.82$260.00$122.22$49.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.56$5.84$120.55$69.78$12.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.0%+56.0%+98.9%+95.5%+98.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10085.761.170.170.990.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.1M12.9M3.7M4.7M670K
Evenly matched — NET and AKAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: DOCN as "Buy", FSLY as "Hold", NET as "Buy", AKAM as "Hold", BAND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.0% upside for FSLY (target: $20) vs -46.1% for DOCN (target: $81).

MetricDOCN logoDOCNDigitalOcean Hold…FSLY logoFSLYFastly, Inc.NET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.AKAM logoAKAMAkamai Technologi…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$81.13$19.50$216.43$111.18$46.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1917405215
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%0.0%0.0%+4.7%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

DOCN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NET leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DOCN vs FSLY vs NET vs AKAM vs BAND: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) offers the better valuation at 38. 0x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND?

On trailing P/E, Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) is the cheapest at 38. 0x versus DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. at 59. 8x. On forward P/E, Akamai Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND?

Over the past 5 years, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) delivered a total return of +258. 9%, compared to -61. 3% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NET returned +1328% versus FSLY's -18. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning DOCN is approximately 204% more volatile than AKAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 3% for Cloudflare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 183. 1% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NET leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND?

DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.

(DOCN) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus -19. 5% for Fastly, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCN leads at 17. 4% versus -18. 9% for FSLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NET leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) trades at 17. 0x forward P/E versus 228. 9x for Cloudflare, Inc. — 211. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSLY: 0. 0% to $19. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is DOCN or FSLY or NET or AKAM or BAND better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1328% 10Y return). DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NET: +1328%, DOCN: +254. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DOCN and FSLY and NET and AKAM and BAND?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DOCN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FSLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AKAM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DOCN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AKAM

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59862%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DOCN and FSLY and NET and AKAM and BAND on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DOCN: 22.4% · FSLY: 19.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.