Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs TDOC vs PGNY vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Banks - Diversified
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs TDOC vs PGNY vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Equipment & Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3.75B | $5.89B | $150.09B | $1.32B | $2.09B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $645M | $2.37B | $11.63B | $2.51B | $1.29B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $196M | $-13M | $1.43B | $-171M | $68M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 89.1% | 67.6% | 39.1% | 65.6% | 24.1% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 1.3% | 4.4% | -7.6% | 7.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 14.0x | 52.6x | 74.0x | — | 20.8x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $1.26B | $21.38B | $1.04B | $24M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $219M | $229M | $5.03B | $781M | $112M | $343.34B |
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs TDOC vs PGNY vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 246.3 | +146.3% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 257.8 | +157.8% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 4.4 | -95.6% |
| Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 206.2 | +106.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs TDOC vs PGNY vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.27 vs PGNY's 3.11
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.27 vs 0.81
- 30.4% margin vs TDOC's -6.8%
- 16.5% ROA vs TDOC's -5.9%, ROIC 19.8% vs -11.5%
HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.04, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.04 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage
- +43.0% vs DOCS's -64.8%
Among these 6 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PGNY doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs WELL's 234.6%
- 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.27 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.4% margin vs TDOC's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.0% vs DOCS's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.5% ROA vs TDOC's -5.9%, ROIC 19.8% vs -11.5% |
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs TDOC vs PGNY vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs TDOC vs PGNY vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
WELL leads 2 • TDOC leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • HIMS leads 0 • PGNY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 434.7x DOCS's $645M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 30.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TDOC's -6.8%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $645M | $2.4B | $11.6B | $2.5B | $1.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $227M | $99M | $2.8B | $42M | $100M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $196M | -$13M | $1.4B | -$171M | $68M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $215M | $76M | $2.5B | $251M | $181M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.1% | +67.6% | +39.1% | +65.6% | +24.1% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +1.3% | +4.4% | -7.6% | +7.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | -0.6% | +12.3% | -6.8% | +5.2% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +3.2% | +21.9% | +10.0% | +14.0% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +3.8% | +40.3% | -2.5% | +1.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.7% | -3.0% | +22.5% | +32.1% | +70.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 90% valuation discount to WELL's 154.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.39x vs PGNY's 6.12x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $5.9B | $150.1B | $1.3B | $2.1B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $6.9B | $166.4B | $1.6B | $2.0B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.45x | 52.59x | 154.12x | -6.44x | 40.97x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.99x | — | 73.96x | — | 20.82x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | — | — | — | 6.12x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.47x | 43.24x | 66.74x | 15.81x | 22.14x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.81x | 2.51x | 14.07x | 0.52x | 1.62x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.20x | 12.80x | 3.37x | 0.93x | 4.62x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 79.62x | 52.70x | 4.64x | 10.88x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TDOC. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.4% | -2.5% | +3.5% | -12.4% | +13.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.5% | -0.6% | +2.3% | -5.9% | +9.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.8% | +8.6% | +0.5% | -11.5% | +18.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.7% | +9.4% | +0.6% | -10.0% | +17.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 2.34x | 0.49x | 0.75x | 0.05x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$209M | $1.0B | $16.3B | $259M | -$88M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $219M | $229M | $5.0B | $781M | $112M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $1.3B | $21.4B | $1.0B | $24M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.26x | -8.76x | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $27,976 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $466 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.0% total return vs DOCS's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 44.0% vs TDOC's -33.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.7% | -19.7% | +15.4% | +4.1% | +3.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.8% | -53.1% | +43.0% | +2.4% | +23.6% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | +198.3% | +171.7% | -69.9% | -32.6% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.2% | +107.9% | +179.8% | -95.3% | -58.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.2% | +173.7% | +234.6% | -41.3% | +67.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.0% | +44.0% | +39.5% | -33.0% | -12.3% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs DOCS's 26.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 2.48x | 0.04x | 1.85x | 0.61x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.51 | $70.43 | $221.68 | $9.77 | $28.75 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.16 | $13.74 | $148.97 | $4.40 | $16.10 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.2% | +38.1% | +96.6% | +75.1% | +92.6% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 59.4 | 52.1 | 58.5 | 64.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 24.7M | 2.5M | 4.5M | 1.4M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOCS as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", TDOC as "Hold", PGNY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.1% upside for DOCS (target: $29) vs 0.7% for HIMS (target: $27). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs WELL's 1.29%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.47 | $27.00 | $239.11 | $7.40 | $30.33 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 20 | 34 | 42 | 20 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.76 | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.5% | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +3.9% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WELL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs TDOC vs PGNY vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Welltower Inc. at 154. 1x. On forward P/E, Doximity, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 27x versus Progyny, Inc. 's 3. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +179. 8%, compared to -95. 3% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus DOCS's -62. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 5970% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -11. 7% for Doximity, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 4% net margin versus -7. 9% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 33. 3% versus -10. 4% for TDOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Progyny, Inc. 's 3. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 74. 0x for Welltower Inc. — 60. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOCS: 47. 1% to $29. 47.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. DOCS, HIMS, TDOC, PGNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DOCS or HIMS or WELL or TDOC or PGNY or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 1. 3% yield, +234. 6% 10Y return). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +234. 6%, TDOC: -41. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOCS and HIMS and WELL and TDOC and PGNY and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (DOCS (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and WELL (Real Estate) and TDOC (Healthcare) and PGNY (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DOCS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PGNY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. WELL, JPM pay a dividend while DOCS, HIMS, TDOC, PGNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.