Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DOGZ vs WOOF vs CHWY vs FRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Packaged Foods
DOGZ vs WOOF vs CHWY vs FRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $10M | $752M | $9.80B | $2.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $5.96B | $12.35B | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $9M | $151M | $200M |
| Gross Margin | 22.9% | 38.7% | 29.5% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -36.6% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.8x | 27.0x | 41.1x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $1.37B | $502M | $560M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $257M | $596M | $278M |
DOGZ vs WOOF vs CHWY vs FRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dogness (Internatio… (DOGZ) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| Petco Health and We… (WOOF) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
| Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 40.1 | -59.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOGZ vs WOOF vs CHWY vs FRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOGZ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.42
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 15.6%, current ratio 3.35x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 3.35x
- 39.5% revenue growth vs WOOF's -2.5%
WOOF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 41.1x)
- -14.1% vs DOGZ's -93.1%
CHWY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs CHWY's -32.4%
- 17.6% margin vs DOGZ's -31.4%
- 11.4% ROA vs DOGZ's -9.5%, ROIC 5.3% vs -5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.5% revenue growth vs WOOF's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 41.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs DOGZ's -31.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs WOOF's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -14.1% vs DOGZ's -93.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs DOGZ's -9.5%, ROIC 5.3% vs -5.2% |
DOGZ vs WOOF vs CHWY vs FRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOGZ vs WOOF vs CHWY vs FRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
WOOF leads 1 • CHWY leads 1 • DOGZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHWY is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.3B annually — 347.2x DOGZ's $36M. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOGZ's -31.4%. On growth, FRPT holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $6.0B | $12.3B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $317M | $313M | $165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $9M | $151M | $200M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $286M | $463M | $223M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +38.7% | +29.5% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.6% | +2.0% | +1.3% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.4% | +0.2% | +1.2% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | +4.8% | +3.8% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | -2.4% | +8.6% | +13.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +81.6% | -79.4% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
WOOF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.2x trailing earnings, FRPT trades at a 76% valuation discount to WOOF's 86.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WOOF's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHWY's 42.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $752M | $9.8B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $1.9B | $9.7B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.95x | 86.75x | 25.99x | 21.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.76x | 27.02x | 41.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.89x | 42.76x | 16.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.13x | 0.83x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.15x | 0.68x | 38.99x | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.39x | 21.67x | 221.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHWY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHWY delivers a 38.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-11 for DOGZ. DOGZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHWY's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOGZ scores 7/9 vs FRPT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | +0.8% | +38.8% | +17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | +0.2% | +4.8% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.2% | +2.9% | +28.0% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.5% | +3.0% | +12.0% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.18x | 1.92x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $1.1B | -$93M | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $257M | $596M | $278M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $1.4B | $502M | $560M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.36x | 0.95x | 35.37x | 13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHWY five years ago would be worth $3,332 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for DOGZ. Over the past 12 months, WOOF leads with a -14.1% total return vs DOGZ's -93.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRPT at -6.2% vs DOGZ's -60.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.6% | -3.5% | -29.4% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.1% | -14.1% | -38.3% | -31.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -73.0% | -29.2% | -17.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -88.5% | -66.7% | -68.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -90.6% | -32.4% | +517.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.7% | -35.4% | -10.9% | -6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOGZ and FRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOGZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WOOF's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRPT currently trades 62.2% from its 52-week high vs DOGZ's 3.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.92x | 0.70x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.48 | $4.51 | $48.62 | $89.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.02 | $2.24 | $22.74 | $46.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.6% | +61.0% | +48.7% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.4 | 42.5 | 41.4 | 29.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 2.6M | 7.7M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WOOF as "Hold", CHWY as "Buy", FRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.3% upside for CHWY (target: $42) vs 30.5% for WOOF (target: $4).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.59 | $41.71 | $73.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 38 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +9.6% | 0.0% |
FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WOOF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DOGZ vs WOOF vs CHWY vs FRPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) is the stronger pick with 39.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF). Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) offers the better valuation at 21. 2x trailing P/E (41. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT?
On trailing P/E, Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the cheapest at 21. 2x versus Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. at 86. 8x. On forward P/E, Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT?
Over the past 5 years, Chewy, Inc.
(CHWY) delivered a total return of -66. 7%, compared to -96. 4% for Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus DOGZ's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning WOOF is approximately 118% more volatile than DOGZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 192% for Chewy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) is pulling ahead at 39.
5% versus -2. 5% for Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chewy, Inc. grew EPS 893. 4% year-over-year, compared to 30. 9% for Dogness (International) Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus -24. 6% for Dogness (International) Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRPT leads at 8. 6% versus -31. 7% for DOGZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WOOF leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.
(WOOF) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for Freshpet, Inc. — 22. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHWY: 76. 3% to $41. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DOGZ or WOOF or CHWY or FRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOGZ: -98. 9%, WOOF: -90. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOGZ and WOOF and CHWY and FRPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (DOGZ (Consumer Cyclical) and WOOF (Consumer Cyclical) and CHWY (Consumer Cyclical) and FRPT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DOGZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; WOOF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHWY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.