Chemicals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN vs AVNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN vs AVNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $26.86B | $1.34B | $2.56B | $8.43B | $3.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.33B | $2.92B | $5.69B | $8.64B | $3.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.76B | $-359M | $-324M | $399M | $158M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | 5.8% | 12.9% | 19.8% | 31.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | -4.8% | -1.0% | 9.4% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | — | — | 12.5x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $19.60B | $3.59B | $2.73B | $5.08B | $1.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.82B | $211M | $429M | $566M | $511M |
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN vs AVNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Eastman Chemical Co… (EMN) | 100 | 108.2 | +8.2% |
| Avient Corporation (AVNT) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN vs AVNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.76, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.76 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
TROX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 116.1% 10Y total return vs HUN's 57.6%
- +76.9% vs EMN's +2.3%
HUN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.7% yield, vs AVNT's 2.9%
EMN is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 2.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs -0.3%
AVNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth -51.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.4%
- 0.6% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0%
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 12.5x)
- 4.8% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.6% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs TROX's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, vs AVNT's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.9% vs EMN's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs -0.3% |
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN vs AVNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN vs AVNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVNT leads in 1 of 6 categories
TROX leads 1 • DOW leads 0 • HUN leads 0 • EMN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVNT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 13.5x TROX's $2.9B. AVNT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, TROX holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.3B | $2.9B | $5.7B | $8.6B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $166M | $160M | $1.2B | $445M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.8B | -$359M | -$324M | $399M | $158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.0B | -$139M | $135M | $498M | $205M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +5.8% | +12.9% | +19.8% | +31.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -4.8% | -1.0% | +9.4% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | -12.3% | -5.7% | +4.6% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -4.8% | +2.4% | +5.8% | +6.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +3.0% | +0.7% | -4.9% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -68.2% | +7.1% | -3.3% | -40.8% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HUN and AVNT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.0x trailing earnings, EMN trades at a 56% valuation discount to AVNT's 41.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EMN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUN's 19.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.9B | $1.3B | $2.6B | $8.4B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42.6B | $4.7B | $4.9B | $12.9B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.11x | -2.83x | -9.27x | 17.97x | 41.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | — | — | 12.50x | 11.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 5.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.78x | 16.80x | 19.64x | 8.96x | 12.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.46x | 0.45x | 0.96x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 0.92x | 0.86x | 1.41x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.11x | 19.87x | 17.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — EMN and AVNT each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMN delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. AVNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMN scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.4% | -30.4% | -8.1% | +6.7% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | -7.7% | -4.6% | +2.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | -0.3% | -0.6% | +6.7% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -0.4% | -0.7% | +7.5% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | 2.48x | 0.92x | 0.84x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.8B | $3.4B | $2.3B | $4.5B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $211M | $429M | $566M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.6B | $3.6B | $2.7B | $5.1B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.51x | -1.16x | -1.08x | 2.22x | 3.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TROX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVNT five years ago would be worth $7,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +76.9% total return vs EMN's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EMN at 1.1% vs HUN's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.2% | +98.1% | +45.5% | +15.8% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.3% | +76.9% | +37.5% | +2.3% | +4.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.5% | -23.6% | -33.3% | +3.4% | +2.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -55.1% | -39.8% | -28.4% | -22.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +116.1% | +57.6% | +35.4% | +27.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.2% | -8.6% | -12.6% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOW and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 2.37x | 1.73x | 1.36x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.74 | $10.59 | $15.89 | $84.18 | $44.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.40 | $2.86 | $7.30 | $56.11 | $27.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.3% | +79.4% | +92.7% | +87.5% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 58.5 | 65.4 | 56.9 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.4M | 3.1M | 6.2M | 1.5M | 620K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HUN and AVNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOW as "Hold", TROX as "Buy", HUN as "Hold", EMN as "Buy", AVNT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.6% upside for AVNT (target: $48) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, HUN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.74% vs AVNT's 2.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.55 | $7.25 | $12.00 | $77.29 | $48.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 17 | 33 | 35 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +3.6% | +5.7% | +4.5% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.09 | $0.30 | $0.85 | $3.30 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.2% | +0.1% |
AVNT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TROX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN vs AVNT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the stronger pick with 0.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT?
On trailing P/E, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the cheapest at 18.
0x versus Avient Corporation at 41. 0x. On forward P/E, Avient Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT?
Over the past 5 years, Avient Corporation (AVNT) delivered a total return of -22.
7%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROX returned +116. 1% versus DOW's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dow Inc.
(DOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 213% more volatile than DOW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avient Corporation (AVNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avient Corporation (AVNT) is pulling ahead at 0.
6% versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntsman Corporation grew EPS -44. 5% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVNT leads at -1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT?
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMN leads at 10. 6% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVNT leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avient Corporation (AVNT) trades at 12.
0x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Dow Inc. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 32. 6% to $48. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 2. 9% for Avient Corporation (AVNT).
09Is DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN or AVNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dow Inc.
(DOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 5. 6% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOW: +12. 2%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOW and TROX and HUN and EMN and AVNT?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EMN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.