Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DQ vs FSLR vs RUN vs CSIQ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • CN
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.+79.5%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+360.3%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.24B
5Y Perf.-17.4%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-6.0%

DQ vs FSLR vs RUN vs CSIQ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DQ logoDQ
FSLR logoFSLR
RUN logoRUN
CSIQ logoCSIQ
IndustrySemiconductorsSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$1.24B$23.06B$3.24B$1.18B
Revenue (TTM)$569M$5.42B$3.17B$5.60B
Net Income (TTM)$-187M$1.67B$568M$-104M
Gross Margin-34.4%41.7%23.5%18.3%
Operating Margin-54.4%33.0%-1.8%0.1%
Forward P/E12.0x22.8x
Total Debt$0.00$499M$14.89B$7.68B
Cash & Equiv.$980M$2.80B$1.24B$1.91B

DQ vs FSLR vs RUN vs CSIQLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DQ
FSLR
RUN
CSIQ
StockMay 20May 26Return
Daqo New Energy Cor… (DQ)100179.5+79.5%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100460.3+360.3%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)10082.6-17.4%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)10094.0-6.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DQ vs FSLR vs RUN vs CSIQ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Sunrun Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. CSIQ also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.
The Secondary Option

DQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 324.1% 10Y total return vs DQ's 271.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Income Pick

RUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.89
  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • 45.1% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CSIQ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +97.1% vs DQ's +41.3%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUN logoRUN45.1% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3%
ValueFSLR logoFSLRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs DQ's -32.9%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.39 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+97.1% vs DQ's +41.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs DQ's -2.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -4.1%

DQ vs FSLR vs RUN vs CSIQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DQDaqo New Energy Corp.
FY 2017
Product
100.0%$353M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M

DQ vs FSLR vs RUN vs CSIQ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGCSIQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 9.8x DQ's $569M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DQ's -32.9%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$569M$5.4B$3.2B$5.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$128M$2.2B$541M$284M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$187M$1.7B$568M-$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$203M$1.7B-$326M-$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-34.4%+41.7%+23.5%+18.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-54.4%+33.0%-1.8%+0.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-32.9%+30.7%+17.9%-1.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-35.8%+30.8%-10.3%-29.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.4%+23.6%+43.2%-20.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-19.3%+65.1%+2.1%-3.7%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FSLR and CSIQ each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 47% valuation discount to FSLR's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.

MetricDQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$23.1B$3.2B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$262M$20.8B$16.9B$7.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.20x15.10x8.07x-11.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.04x22.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.38x24.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.87x4.42x1.09x0.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.21x2.42x0.75x0.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.42x
Evenly matched — FSLR and CSIQ each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-3 for DQ. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.2%+18.0%+12.4%-2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.9%+12.6%+2.5%-0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.1%+17.6%-0.5%-0.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.6%+15.9%-0.6%-0.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94761
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x2.99x1.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$980M-$2.3B$13.6B$5.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$980M$2.8B$1.2B$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$499M$14.9B$7.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense53.51x-0.02x0.02x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,458 for DQ. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs DQ's +41.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs DQ's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-38.1%-21.8%-29.0%-30.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.3%+65.3%+86.7%+97.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.1%+20.9%-19.7%-52.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.4%+187.6%-69.8%-55.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+271.0%+324.1%+86.7%+14.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-25.2%+6.5%-7.1%-21.9%
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs DQ's 50.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.80x1.39x2.89x2.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.59$285.99$22.44$34.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.72$125.80$5.38$8.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.2%+75.0%+61.5%+51.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.164.349.062.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded719K2.1M10.4M2.5M
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RUN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: DQ as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for CSIQ (target: $29) vs 1.1% for DQ (target: $19).

MetricDQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.56$264.13$18.14$28.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts13733633
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%+5.9%
RUN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RUN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DQ vs FSLR vs RUN vs CSIQ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ?

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus First Solar, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, First Solar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -75. 4% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus CSIQ's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 108% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -387. 0% for Canadian Solar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -25. 6% for Daqo New Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -40. 6% for DQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSLR leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSIQ: 63. 3% to $28. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is DQ or FSLR or RUN or CSIQ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+324. 1% 10Y return). Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +324. 1%, CSIQ: +14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DQ and FSLR and RUN and CSIQ?

These companies operate in different sectors (DQ (Technology) and FSLR (Energy) and RUN (Energy) and CSIQ (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DQ and FSLR and RUN and CSIQ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DQ: -78.4% · FSLR: 23.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.