Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DQ vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
DQ vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $3.24B | $866M | $23.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $569M | $3.17B | $315M | $5.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-187M | $568M | $-42M | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | -34.4% | 23.5% | 50.4% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -54.4% | -1.8% | -2.7% | 33.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.8x | 5.1x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $14.89B | $188M | $499M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $980M | $1.24B | $10M | $2.80B |
DQ vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daqo New Energy Cor… (DQ) | 100 | 47.0 | -53.0% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 103.5 | +3.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DQ vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.89
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3%
- +86.7% vs SPWR's -42.4%
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 12.0x)
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs DQ's 271.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
- 30.7% margin vs DQ's -32.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 12.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs DQ's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.7% vs SPWR's -42.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.3% |
DQ vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DQ vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories
SPWR leads 1 • DQ leads 0 • RUN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 17.2x SPWR's $315M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DQ's -32.9%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $569M | $3.2B | $315M | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$128M | $541M | -$6M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$187M | $568M | -$42M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$203M | -$326M | -$15M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -34.4% | +23.5% | +50.4% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -54.4% | -1.8% | -2.7% | +33.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | +17.9% | -13.2% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -35.8% | -10.3% | -4.6% | +30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.4% | +43.2% | -0.2% | +23.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.3% | +2.1% | -101.3% | +65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 47% valuation discount to FSLR's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $3.2B | $866M | $23.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $262M | $16.9B | $1.0B | $20.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.20x | 8.07x | -15.25x | 15.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.75x | 5.10x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.31x | — | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.87x | 1.09x | 2.80x | 4.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 0.75x | — | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 19.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-3 for DQ. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs DQ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.2% | +12.4% | — | +18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | +2.5% | -19.5% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.1% | -0.5% | -5.3% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.6% | -0.6% | -7.2% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.99x | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$980M | $13.6B | $179M | -$2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $980M | $1.2B | $10M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14.9B | $188M | $499M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.02x | -1.57x | 53.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +86.7% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.1% | -29.0% | -38.2% | -21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.3% | +86.7% | -42.4% | +65.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.1% | -19.7% | -81.3% | +20.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.4% | -69.8% | -81.3% | +187.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.0% | +86.7% | -81.3% | +324.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.2% | -7.1% | -42.8% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 2.89x | 2.13x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.59 | $22.44 | $2.27 | $285.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.72 | $5.38 | $0.81 | $125.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.2% | +61.5% | +44.9% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.1 | 49.0 | 45.9 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 719K | 10.4M | 1.7M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DQ as "Hold", RUN as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 1.1% for DQ (target: $19).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.56 | $18.14 | $15.81 | $264.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 36 | 45 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
DQ vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus First Solar, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 108% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -25. 6% for Daqo New Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -40. 6% for DQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 17. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DQ or RUN or SPWR or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+324. 1% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +324. 1%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DQ and RUN and SPWR and FSLR?
These companies operate in different sectors (DQ (Technology) and RUN (Energy) and SPWR (Energy) and FSLR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.