DRD vs NEM

For growth investors, DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) is the stronger pick with 26.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 18.

0x versus DRDGOLD Limited at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, DRDGOLD Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) delivered a total return of +194.

9%, compared to +83. 6% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRD returned +527. 0% versus NEM's +271. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

52β versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 75β — meaning NEM is approximately 46% more volatile than DRD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 1% for Newmont Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) is pulling ahead at 26.

3% versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to 68. 2% for DRDGOLD Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

1% net margin versus 28. 5% for DRDGOLD Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 11. 6% for DRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEM leads at 49. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) trades at 0.

6x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for Newmont Corporation — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DRD: 59. 4% to $46. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Newmont Corporation (NEM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), 1. 0% yield, +527. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRD: +527. 0%, NEM: +271. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.