DT
Dynatrace, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$11.45B
5Y Perf.-0.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DT vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
DT vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DT | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $11.45B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.93B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $185M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 81.6% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.7x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.02B | $86.81B |
DT vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DT
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) | 100 | 99.3 | -0.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DT vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DT and AMZN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
DT
Dynatrace, Inc.
The Income Pick
DT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth 205.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.40x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs DT's 60.2%
- 12.2% margin vs DT's 9.6%
- +48.6% vs DT's -19.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | DT | 18.7% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% |
| Value | DT | Lower P/E (22.7x vs 35.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs DT's 9.6% |
| Stability / Safety | DT | Beta 0.80 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +48.6% vs DT's -19.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs DT's 4.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs 9.0% |
DT vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
DT vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDTLAGGINGAMZN
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
2leads
DTDynatrace, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AMZNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
DT4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 384.5x DT's $1.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (AMZN) to 9.6% (DT).
| Metric | DTDynatrace, Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $276M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $466M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.6% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.1% | +74.8% |
DT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
DT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.0x trailing earnings, DT trades at a 37% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DT's 46.2x.
| Metric | DTDynatrace, Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.4B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.03x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.70x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 46.17x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.74x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.43x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.42x | 384.26x |
DT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $7 for DT. DT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs DT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | DTDynatrace, Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$942M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,260 for DT. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs DT's -19.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs DT's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DTDynatrace, Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.8% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.3% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.1% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.2% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.6% | +37.5% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DT is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs DT's 66.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DTDynatrace, Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.55 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.64 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.4% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 45.6M |
Evenly matched — DT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DT as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.4% upside for DT (target: $50) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | DTDynatrace, Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.81 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
DT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallDynatrace, Inc. (DT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DT vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DT or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (22. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DT or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the cheapest at 24. 0x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Dynatrace, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DT or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -17. 4% for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus DT's +60. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DT or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 88% more volatile than DT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DT or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dynatrace, Inc. grew EPS 205. 8% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DT leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DT or AMZN?
Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 10. 6% for DT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DT leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DT or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) trades at 22. 7x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DT: 30. 4% to $49. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — DT or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DT or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dynatrace, Inc.
(DT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DT: +60. 2%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DT and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (DT (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DT: 18.2% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(DT: 9.6% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(DT: 24.0x · AMZN: 38.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.