DTM vs EPD

For growth investors, DT Midstream, Inc.

(DTM) is the stronger pick with 26. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus DT Midstream, Inc. at 32. 6x. On forward P/E, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Enterprise Products Partners L. P. wins at 1. 42x versus DT Midstream, Inc. 's 4. 63x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, DT Midstream, Inc.

(DTM) delivered a total return of +278. 1%, compared to +104. 8% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DTM returned +278. 1% versus EPD's +116. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus DT Midstream, Inc. 's 0. 26β — meaning DTM is approximately 306% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 114% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DT Midstream, Inc.

(DTM) is pulling ahead at 26. 7% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DT Midstream, Inc. grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DTM leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

DT Midstream, Inc.

(DTM) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 5% net margin versus 11. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 35. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DTM leads at 49. 4% versus 13. 1% for EPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DTM leads at 73. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus DT Midstream, Inc. 's 4. 63x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 30. 5x for DT Midstream, Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DTM: -0. 0% to $144. 56.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 2. 2% for DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 5. 7% yield, +116. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPD: +116. 1%, DTM: +278. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DTM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.