DTM vs OKE

For growth investors, ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the stronger pick with 55. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 7% for DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM). ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) a "Hold" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus DT Midstream, Inc. at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, ONEOK, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ONEOK, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus DT Midstream, Inc. 's 4. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, DT Midstream, Inc.

(DTM) delivered a total return of +277. 1%, compared to +97. 7% for ONEOK, Inc. (OKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DTM returned +277. 1% versus OKE's +210. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus DT Midstream, Inc. 's 0. 26β — meaning DTM is approximately 87% more volatile than OKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 145% for ONEOK, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is pulling ahead at 55. 4% versus 26. 7% for DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DT Midstream, Inc. grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for ONEOK, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OKE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

DT Midstream, Inc.

(DTM) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 5% net margin versus 10. 1% for ONEOK, Inc. — meaning it keeps 35. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DTM leads at 49. 4% versus 20. 7% for OKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DTM leads at 73. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus DT Midstream, Inc. 's 4. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 30. 4x for DT Midstream, Inc. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OKE: 4. 7% to $89. 88.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 2. 2% for DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 4. 8% yield, +210. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OKE: +210. 5%, DTM: +277. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.