Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DTST vs INTT vs AEHR vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Information Technology Services
DTST vs INTT vs AEHR vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $31M | $208M | $2.79B | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $121M | $49M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $591K | $-11M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 44.0% | 30.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -8.5% | 0.7% | -27.8% | -1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 58.1x | 37.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $673K | $16M | $11M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $14M | $25M | $28M |
DTST vs INTT vs AEHR vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Storage Corpor… (DTST) | 100 | 3872.7 | +3772.7% |
| inTEST Corporation (INTT) | 100 | 542.5 | +442.5% |
| Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) | 100 | 5892.7 | +5792.7% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 48.1 | -51.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DTST vs INTT vs AEHR vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DTST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.6%, EPS growth 34.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.5%
- 206.0% 10Y total return vs AEHR's 70.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 3.2%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 4.35x
INTT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
AEHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +9.9% vs CLPS's -5.4%
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2%
- Beta 0.27 vs AEHR's 4.77
- 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 81.5% margin vs AEHR's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs AEHR's 4.77 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.9% vs CLPS's -5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.3% ROA vs AEHR's -7.5%, ROIC 0.3% vs -3.0% |
DTST vs INTT vs AEHR vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DTST vs INTT vs AEHR vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
DTST leads 1 • AEHR leads 1 • INTT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DTST and INTT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 14.9x DTST's $20M. DTST is the more profitable business, keeping 81.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEHR's -22.7%. On growth, INTT holds the edge at +27.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $121M | $49M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$440,228 | $6M | -$10M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $591,000 | -$11M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52,808 | -$3M | -$14M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +44.0% | +30.2% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | +0.7% | -27.8% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +0.5% | -22.7% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -2.5% | -28.1% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.8% | +27.2% | -26.5% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.7% | +133.4% | -2.2% | +75.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DTST's 20.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INTT's 68.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $208M | $2.8B | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $209M | $2.8B | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.15x | -79.10x | -702.00x | -3.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.96x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.05x | 68.02x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 1.82x | 47.39x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.44x | 1.96x | 21.97x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.52x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DTST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DTST delivers a 41.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AEHR. DTST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DTST scores 6/9 vs AEHR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.7% | +0.6% | -8.5% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.3% | +0.4% | -7.5% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | -2.6% | -3.0% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.4% | -3.2% | -3.2% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.15x | 0.09x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$396,647 | $1M | -$14M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $14M | $25M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $673,450 | $16M | $11M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.10x | 2.17x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEHR five years ago would be worth $398,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,073 for CLPS. Over the past 12 months, AEHR leads with a +991.6% total return vs CLPS's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEHR at 50.7% vs INTT's -8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.8% | +120.3% | +311.8% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.3% | +159.9% | +991.6% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.0% | -22.1% | +242.3% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1781.8% | +29.8% | +3885.1% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20600.0% | +327.0% | +7029.7% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.0% | -8.0% | +50.7% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AEHR and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEHR's 4.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEHR currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs CLPS's 48.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.25x | 4.86x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.44 | $19.75 | $102.48 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.25 | $5.58 | $8.06 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.1% | +84.1% | +89.1% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 55.5 | 67.6 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 251K | 3.0M | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INTT as "Buy", AEHR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -31.8% upside for INTT (target: $11) vs -32.1% for AEHR (target: $62). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.33 | $62.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 3 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). DTST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DTST vs INTT vs AEHR vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for inTEST Corporation (INTT). Data Storage Corporation (DTST) offers the better valuation at 58. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate inTEST Corporation (INTT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) delivered a total return of +38.
9%, compared to -69. 3% for CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DTST returned +212. 0% versus CLPS's -78. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Aehr Test Systems's 4. 86β — meaning AEHR is approximately 2396% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Data Storage Corporation (DTST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.
2% versus -12. 9% for inTEST Corporation (INTT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Data Storage Corporation grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -187. 5% for inTEST Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DTST leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS?
Data Storage Corporation (DTST) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
1% net margin versus -6. 6% for Aehr Test Systems — meaning it keeps 2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DTST leads at 0. 3% versus -7. 3% for AEHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DTST leads at 43. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INTT: -31.
8% to $11. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. DTST, INTT, AEHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is DTST or INTT or AEHR or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 14. 6% yield). Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) carries a higher beta of 4. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, AEHR: +75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DTST and INTT and AEHR and CLPS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DTST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INTT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while DTST, INTT, AEHR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.