Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DUK vs PCG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
DUK vs PCG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $97.70B | $35.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.29B | $25.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.14B | $2.95B |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | 27.0% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $90.87B | $61.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245M | $713M |
DUK vs PCG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Energy Corpora… (DUK) | 100 | 146.6 | +46.6% |
| PG&E Corporation (PCG) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUK vs PCG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.24, yield 3.4%
- Rev growth 6.2%, EPS growth 10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 106.8% 10Y total return vs PCG's -67.1%
PCG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 18.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.2% revenue growth vs PCG's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.4% margin vs PCG's 11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (171.4% vs 187.0%) | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PCG's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs PCG's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs PCG's 2.1%, ROIC 4.6% vs 4.0% |
DUK vs PCG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DUK vs PCG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUK and PCG operate at a comparable scale, with $33.3B and $25.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.4% (DUK) to 11.4% (PCG). On growth, PCG holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33.3B | $25.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15.3B | $9.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.1B | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.6B | -$4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.4% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | -16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | +15.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +39.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PCG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, PCG trades at a 31% valuation discount to DUK's 19.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCG's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUK's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97.7B | $35.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $188.3B | $96.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.90x | 13.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.74x | 9.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.64x | 9.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.03x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.84x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DUK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DUK delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for PCG. DUK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCG's 1.87x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.71x | 1.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $90.6B | $60.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245M | $713M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $90.9B | $61.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.57x | 1.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DUK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCG five years ago would be worth $15,005 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,516 for DUK. Over the past 12 months, DUK leads with a +5.6% total return vs PCG's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DUK at 11.8% vs PCG's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | -0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.6% | -4.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.6% | -5.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.2% | +50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | -67.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
DUK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DUK is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCG's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DUK currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs PCG's 84.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.24x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.49 | $19.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $111.22 | $12.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.3% | +84.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 35.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 21.2M |
Analyst Outlook
DUK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DUK as "Hold" and PCG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.2% upside for PCG (target: $23) vs 7.9% for DUK (target: $135). For income investors, DUK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.38% vs PCG's 0.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $135.44 | $23.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.25 | $0.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DUK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PCG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
DUK vs PCG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUK or PCG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the stronger pick with 6.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). PG&E Corporation (PCG) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PG&E Corporation (PCG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUK or PCG?
On trailing P/E, PG&E Corporation (PCG) is the cheapest at 13.
7x versus Duke Energy Corporation at 19. 9x. On forward P/E, PG&E Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUK or PCG?
Over the past 5 years, PG&E Corporation (PCG) delivered a total return of +50.
0%, compared to +45. 2% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DUK returned +106. 8% versus PCG's -67. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUK or PCG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus PG&E Corporation's 0. 45β — meaning PCG is approximately -283% more volatile than DUK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 171% versus 187% for PG&E Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUK or PCG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is pulling ahead at 6.
2% versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duke Energy Corporation grew EPS 10. 5% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for PG&E Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCG leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUK or PCG?
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
4% net margin versus 10. 8% for PG&E Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUK leads at 26. 6% versus 19. 6% for PCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUK leads at 31. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUK or PCG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PG&E Corporation (PCG) trades at 9.
8x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Duke Energy Corporation — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCG: 42. 2% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUK or PCG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 0. 6% for PG&E Corporation (PCG).
09Is DUK or PCG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 3. 4% yield, +106. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DUK: +106. 8%, PCG: -67. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUK and PCG?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DUK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PCG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.