Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DUOT vs PESI vs CWST vs RAIL vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Waste Management
Railroads
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
DUOT vs PESI vs CWST vs RAIL vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Waste Management | Waste Management | Railroads | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $214M | $204M | $5.60B | $259M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $59M | $1.88B | $469M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-18M | $7M | $29M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 4.1% | 17.4% | 14.8% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -46.8% | -26.3% | 4.5% | 6.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 292.0x | — | 66.0x | 17.5x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $4M | $1.24B | $152M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $12M | $124M | $64M | $10.27B |
DUOT vs PESI vs CWST vs RAIL vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duos Technologies G… (DUOT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
| FreightCar America,… (RAIL) | 100 | 655.6 | +555.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUOT vs PESI vs CWST vs RAIL vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 271.2%, EPS growth 54.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.6%
- 271.2% revenue growth vs RAIL's -10.4%
- +46.7% vs CWST's -24.5%
Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CWST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.27
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.27 vs DUOT's 2.73
RAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.90, current ratio 1.87x
- Lower P/E (17.5x vs 25.3x)
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs CWST's 11.1%
- 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 13.1% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -21.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 271.2% revenue growth vs RAIL's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs DUOT's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs CWST's -24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -21.7% |
DUOT vs PESI vs CWST vs RAIL vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DUOT vs PESI vs CWST vs RAIL vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
RAIL leads 1 • DUOT leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 1987.8x DUOT's $25M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DUOT's -45.4%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $59M | $1.9B | $469M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$14M | $414M | $34M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$18M | $7M | $29M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | -$18M | $102M | $14M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +4.1% | +17.4% | +14.8% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.8% | -26.3% | +4.5% | +6.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.4% | -30.1% | +0.4% | +6.2% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -29.9% | +5.5% | +3.1% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.0% | -20.1% | +9.6% | -33.2% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -110.5% | -18.6% | -24.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RAIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, RAIL trades at a 99% valuation discount to CWST's 744.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RAIL's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $214M | $204M | $5.6B | $259M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $197M | $6.7B | $347M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.25x | -14.66x | 744.75x | 7.46x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 292.00x | — | 66.00x | 17.55x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 16.34x | 8.64x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.92x | 3.31x | 3.05x | 0.52x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.68x | 4.05x | 3.62x | — | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 66.07x | 8.24x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.5% | -34.5% | +0.5% | — | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.7% | -20.2% | +0.2% | +9.4% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.7% | -21.7% | +2.6% | — | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.4% | -16.7% | +2.9% | +19.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.09x | 0.79x | — | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | -$7M | $1.1B | $88M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $12M | $124M | $64M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $4M | $1.2B | $152M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.47x | -42.14x | 1.12x | -0.57x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RAIL and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,008 for DUOT. Over the past 12 months, DUOT leads with a +46.7% total return vs CWST's -24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAIL at 43.7% vs CWST's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | -10.2% | -9.4% | -25.6% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +6.4% | -24.5% | -8.7% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.9% | -2.9% | -3.3% | +196.7% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.1% | +59.6% | +36.2% | +34.8% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | +101.0% | +1107.7% | -38.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | -1.0% | -1.1% | +43.7% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DUOT's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs RAIL's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.97x | 0.27x | 1.90x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.28 | $16.50 | $118.91 | $14.90 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.78 | $8.02 | $74.05 | $7.27 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +66.6% | +75.2% | +54.6% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 45.6 | 59.2 | 54.5 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 628K | 195K | 686K | 153K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DUOT as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy", RAIL as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.7% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $18.00 | $112.33 | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 19 | 13 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RAIL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DUOT vs PESI vs CWST vs RAIL vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is the stronger pick with 271. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO?
On trailing P/E, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 744. 8x. On forward P/E, FreightCar America, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to +10. 1% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1108% versus DUOT's -58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Duos Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning DUOT is approximately -1464% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is pulling ahead at 271. 2% versus -10. 4% for FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FreightCar America, Inc. grew EPS 134. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUOT leads at 21. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -36. 4% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -36. 1% for DUOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 292. 0x for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — 274. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 63. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. DUOT, PESI, CWST, RAIL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DUOT or PESI or CWST or RAIL or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, DUOT: -58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUOT and PESI and CWST and RAIL and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (DUOT (Technology) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials) and RAIL (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DUOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; RAIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while DUOT, PESI, CWST, RAIL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.