Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DUOT vs RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
Railroads
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
DUOT vs RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Railroads | Railroads | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $214M | $259M | $2.78B | $88M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $469M | $2.06B | $59M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $29M | $255M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 14.8% | 27.0% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | -46.8% | 6.3% | 16.6% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 292.0x | 17.5x | 15.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $152M | $5.44B | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $64M | $201M | $8M |
DUOT vs RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duos Technologies G… (DUOT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| FreightCar America,… (RAIL) | 100 | 655.6 | +555.6% |
| Trinity Industries,… (TRN) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 39.7 | -60.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUOT vs RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 271.2%, EPS growth 54.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.6%
- 271.2% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0%
- +46.7% vs RAIL's -8.7%
RAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 9.4% ROA vs DUOT's -15.7%
TRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.4%
- 228.6% 10Y total return vs RAIL's -38.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 2.12x
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.4%, current ratio 2.12x
GNSS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 271.2% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs DUOT's -45.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs DUOT's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs RAIL's -8.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs DUOT's -15.7% |
DUOT vs RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DUOT vs RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRN leads in 4 of 6 categories
GNSS leads 1 • DUOT leads 0 • RAIL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 83.2x DUOT's $25M. TRN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DUOT's -45.4%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +123.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $469M | $2.1B | $59M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $34M | $646M | -$11,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $29M | $255M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | $14M | -$283M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +14.8% | +27.0% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.8% | +6.3% | +16.6% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.4% | +6.2% | +12.4% | -13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +3.1% | -13.7% | -9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.0% | -33.2% | -16.0% | +123.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -24.3% | +15.4% | +111.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RAIL and TRN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, RAIL trades at a 35% valuation discount to TRN's 11.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RAIL's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRN's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $214M | $259M | $2.8B | $88M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $347M | $8.0B | $101M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.25x | 7.46x | 11.40x | -4.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 292.00x | 17.55x | 14.95x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.64x | 12.08x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.92x | 0.52x | 1.29x | 2.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.68x | — | 2.52x | 40.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.24x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRN delivers a 21.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GNSS. DUOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRN scores 8/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.5% | — | +21.3% | -3.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.7% | +9.4% | +3.0% | -12.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.7% | — | +4.1% | -56.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.4% | +19.5% | +4.7% | -68.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | 4.75x | 9.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $88M | $5.2B | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $64M | $201M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $152M | $5.4B | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.47x | -0.57x | 1.29x | -2.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRN five years ago would be worth $13,745 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,277 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, DUOT leads with a +46.7% total return vs RAIL's -8.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAIL at 43.7% vs GNSS's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | -25.6% | +31.3% | -11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | -8.7% | +36.3% | +22.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.9% | +196.7% | +65.8% | -28.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.1% | +34.8% | +37.4% | -67.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | -38.8% | +228.6% | +6.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | +43.7% | +18.4% | -10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DUOT's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRN currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs RAIL's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.90x | 0.81x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.28 | $14.90 | $37.36 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.78 | $7.27 | $22.38 | $1.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +54.6% | +93.0% | +71.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 54.5 | 56.3 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 628K | 153K | 583K | 125K |
Analyst Outlook
TRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DUOT as "Buy", RAIL as "Hold", TRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for DUOT (target: $17) vs 0.7% for TRN (target: $35). TRN is the only dividend payer here at 3.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | — | $35.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 | 25 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.6% | 0.0% |
TRN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GNSS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
DUOT vs RAIL vs TRN vs GNSS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is the stronger pick with 271. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS?
On trailing P/E, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Trinity Industries, Inc. at 11. 4x. On forward P/E, Trinity Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS?
Over the past 5 years, Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) delivered a total return of +37. 4%, compared to -67. 2% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRN returned +228. 6% versus DUOT's -58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Duos Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning DUOT is approximately 236% more volatile than TRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is pulling ahead at 271. 2% versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FreightCar America, Inc. grew EPS 134. 9% year-over-year, compared to 44. 4% for Genasys Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUOT leads at 21. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS?
Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRN leads at 16. 6% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNSS leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 292. 0x for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — 277. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DUOT: 45. 5% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS?
In this comparison, TRN (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. DUOT, RAIL, GNSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DUOT or RAIL or TRN or GNSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 4% yield, +228. 6% 10Y return). Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRN: +228. 6%, DUOT: -58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUOT and RAIL and TRN and GNSS?
These companies operate in different sectors (DUOT (Technology) and RAIL (Industrials) and TRN (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DUOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RAIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRN is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock. TRN pays a dividend while DUOT, RAIL, GNSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.