Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EA vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Entertainment
EA vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $50.26B | $26M | $32.05B | $481M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.53B | $289M | $5.30B | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $887M | $-228M | $-1.10B | $-153M |
| Gross Margin | 79.0% | -14.1% | 78.5% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | -140.6% | -24.0% | -3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.4x | — | — | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $235M | $1.64B | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.86B | $59M | $1.21B | $1.19B |
EA vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| The9 Limited (NCTY) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Roblox Corporation (RBLX) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EA vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 0.4%
- 217.6% 10Y total return vs RBLX's -35.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
- 11.8% margin vs NCTY's -78.9%
NCTY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RBLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- 35.8% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1%
HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.17, yield 56.7%, current ratio 3.14x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs NCTY's -78.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs NCTY's 2.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.7% vs NCTY's -46.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs NCTY's -45.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs -37.2% |
EA vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EA vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EA leads in 3 of 6 categories
HUYA leads 1 • NCTY leads 0 • RBLX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EA is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 26.0x NCTY's $289M. EA is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCTY's -78.9%. On growth, RBLX holds the edge at +39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $289M | $5.3B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$407M | -$1.1B | -$120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $887M | -$228M | -$1.1B | -$153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.3B | -$62M | $1.6B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.0% | -14.1% | +78.5% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | -140.6% | -24.0% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -78.9% | -20.7% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | -21.5% | +31.0% | -1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | -74.3% | +39.3% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.6% | -183.2% | -9.4% | -118.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HUYA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50.3B | $26M | $32.0B | $481M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48.9B | $52M | $32.5B | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 57.22x | -0.76x | -29.07x | -103.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.38x | — | — | 3.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.93x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.81x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.67x | 1.72x | 6.55x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.51x | 1.20x | 82.33x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.64x | — | 23.69x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EA delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-3 for RBLX. HUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBLX's 4.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs NCTY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | -120.6% | -2.9% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | -45.2% | -12.2% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.7% | -37.2% | -87.7% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.7% | -70.7% | -31.0% | -2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.97x | 4.36x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.4B | $176M | $431M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.9B | $59M | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $235M | $1.6B | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -9.65x | -27.89x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EA and HUYA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EA five years ago would be worth $14,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $321 for NCTY. Over the past 12 months, EA leads with a +29.7% total return vs NCTY's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUYA at 25.9% vs NCTY's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | -9.1% | -44.7% | +5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | -46.7% | -36.4% | +26.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | -31.0% | +23.4% | +99.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.6% | -96.8% | -34.1% | -60.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +217.6% | -99.1% | -35.6% | -60.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.3% | -11.6% | +7.3% | +25.9% |
Risk & Volatility
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCTY's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs RBLX's 29.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 2.56x | 1.57x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $204.89 | $12.51 | $150.59 | $4.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $141.19 | $5.00 | $41.75 | $2.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +45.2% | +29.7% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.1 | 54.9 | 29.0 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 31K | 9.1M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EA and HUYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EA as "Hold", NCTY as "Sell", RBLX as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.4% upside for RBLX (target: $89) vs -14.0% for EA (target: $173). For income investors, HUYA offers the higher dividend yield at 56.67% vs EA's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $172.65 | — | $88.81 | $3.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 66 | 3 | 34 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | — | +56.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | — | — | $12.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.6% |
EA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EA vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) offers the better valuation at 57. 2x trailing P/E (23. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roblox Corporation (RBLX) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA?
On forward P/E, HUYA Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA?
Over the past 5 years, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -96. 8% for The9 Limited (NCTY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EA returned +217. 6% versus NCTY's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus The9 Limited's 2. 56β — meaning NCTY is approximately 1285% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HUYA Inc. (HUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Roblox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for The9 Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBLX leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA?
Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -373. 0% for The9 Limited — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EA leads at 15. 4% versus -229. 6% for NCTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EA leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 4x for Electronic Arts Inc. — 19. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBLX: 98. 4% to $88. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA?
In this comparison, HUYA (56.
7% yield), EA (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. NCTY, RBLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EA or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), +217. 6% 10Y return). The9 Limited (NCTY) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EA: +217. 6%, NCTY: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EA and NCTY and RBLX and HUYA?
These companies operate in different sectors (EA (Communication Services) and NCTY (Technology) and RBLX (Technology) and HUYA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RBLX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HUYA pays a dividend while EA, NCTY, RBLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.