Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EBMT vs FIBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
EBMT vs FIBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $182M | $3.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126M | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $302M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 97.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 37.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $82M | $776M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $358M |
Quick Verdict: EBMT vs FIBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EBMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 53.2%
- 114.0% 10Y total return vs FIBK's 42.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 43.0%, current ratio 0.71x
FIBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, yield 5.2%
- Lower D/E ratio (22.5% vs 43.0%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (22.5% vs 43.0%) | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs FIBK's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.2% vs FIBK's +5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs FIBK's 0.6% |
EBMT vs FIBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EBMT vs FIBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIBK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 8.4x EBMT's $126M. FIBK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EBMT's 11.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $428M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $302M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $278M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +97.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +37.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +28.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +26.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +116.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EBMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, EBMT trades at a 2% valuation discount to FIBK's 12.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EBMT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIBK's 10.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $182M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $240M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.03x | 12.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.22x | 13.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.32x | 10.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 3.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.42x | 12.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIBK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIBK delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for EBMT. FIBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBMT's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EBMT scores 9/9 vs FIBK's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $418M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82M | $776M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.53x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIBK five years ago would be worth $12,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,133 for EBMT. Over the past 12 months, EBMT leads with a +32.2% total return vs FIBK's +5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBMT at 26.4% vs FIBK's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | +1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.8% | +14.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +25.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.0% | +42.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
EBMT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
EBMT currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FIBK's 92.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | — |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.95 | $39.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.10 | $31.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EBMT and FIBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EBMT as "Hold" and FIBK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.7% upside for FIBK (target: $38) vs 5.0% for EBMT (target: $24). For income investors, FIBK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.21% vs EBMT's 2.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $38.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.59 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +3.4% |
EBMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FIBK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
EBMT vs FIBK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EBMT or FIBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EBMT or FIBK?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. at 12. 3x. On forward P/E, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EBMT or FIBK?
Over the past 5 years, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) delivered a total return of +25. 4%, compared to +11. 3% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBMT returned +114. 0% versus FIBK's +42. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EBMT or FIBK?
On balance sheet safety, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 43% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EBMT or FIBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. grew EPS 53. 2% year-over-year, compared to 34. 2% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EBMT or FIBK?
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 11. 8% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIBK leads at 37. 0% versus 15. 0% for EBMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIBK leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EBMT or FIBK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIBK: 5. 7% to $38. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — EBMT or FIBK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 2. 6% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT).
09Is EBMT or FIBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBMT: +114. 0%, FIBK: +42. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EBMT and FIBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.