Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EBMT vs NWBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
EBMT vs NWBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $182M | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126M | $877M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $82M | $446M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $234M |
EBMT vs NWBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Bancorp Monta… (EBMT) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EBMT vs NWBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EBMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 2.6%
- 114.0% 10Y total return vs NWBI's 52.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 43.0%, current ratio 0.71x
NWBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs EBMT's 4.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs EBMT's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs EBMT's 4.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs EBMT's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs NWBI's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.2% vs NWBI's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs EBMT's 0.6% |
EBMT vs NWBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EBMT vs NWBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWBI is the larger business by revenue, generating $877M annually — 7.0x EBMT's $126M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.4% (NWBI) to 11.8% (EBMT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126M | $877M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $142M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +19.2% |
Valuation Metrics
EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, EBMT trades at a 20% valuation discount to NWBI's 15.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EBMT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NWBI's 13.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $182M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $240M | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.03x | 15.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.22x | 10.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.32x | 13.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.42x | 14.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWBI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBMT delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for NWBI. NWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBMT's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EBMT scores 9/9 vs NWBI's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $213M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82M | $446M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.53x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NWBI five years ago would be worth $12,663 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,133 for EBMT. Over the past 12 months, EBMT leads with a +32.2% total return vs NWBI's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBMT at 26.4% vs NWBI's 16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.8% | +56.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.0% | +52.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EBMT and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWBI's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.95 | $14.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.10 | $11.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EBMT and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EBMT as "Hold" and NWBI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.1% upside for NWBI (target: $15) vs 5.0% for EBMT (target: $24). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs EBMT's 2.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $14.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.59 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% |
EBMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NWBI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
EBMT vs NWBI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EBMT or NWBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT). Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EBMT or NWBI?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Northwest Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EBMT or NWBI?
Over the past 5 years, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) delivered a total return of +26. 6%, compared to +11. 3% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBMT returned +114. 0% versus NWBI's +52. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EBMT or NWBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Northwest Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NWBI is approximately 27% more volatile than EBMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 43% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EBMT or NWBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 4. 6% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. grew EPS 53. 2% year-over-year, compared to 16. 5% for Northwest Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EBMT or NWBI?
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 4% net margin versus 11. 8% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWBI leads at 18. 8% versus 15. 0% for EBMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBMT leads at 70. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EBMT or NWBI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWBI: 6. 1% to $14. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — EBMT or NWBI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 2. 6% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT).
09Is EBMT or NWBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBMT: +114. 0%, NWBI: +52. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EBMT and NWBI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EBMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.