ECCV
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.-1.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ECCV vs PFLT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
Asset Management
Market Cap$888M
5Y Perf.-30.9%
ECCV vs PFLT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ECCV | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.24B | $888M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $116M | $172M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 84.2% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 73.7% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.9x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $272M | $1.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $123M |
ECCV vs PFLT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ECCV
PFLT
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Point Credit … (ECCV) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| PennantPark Floatin… (PFLT) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECCV vs PFLT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PFLT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ECCV
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
The Banking Pick
ECCV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 29.0%, current ratio 2.22x
- NIM 10.2% vs PFLT's 5.0%
- Beta 0.55 vs PFLT's 0.79, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
The Banking Pick
PFLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.5%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -48.6%
- 72.6% 10Y total return vs ECCV's 20.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PFLT | 2.2% NII/revenue growth vs ECCV's -14.9% |
| Value | PFLT | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 27.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | PFLT | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ECCV's 0.1% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety | ECCV | Beta 0.55 vs PFLT's 0.79, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PFLT | 13.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ECCV's 7.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ECCV | +11.4% vs PFLT's +1.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PFLT | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ECCV's 0.1% |
ECCV vs PFLT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLECCVLAGGINGPFLT
PFLTPennantPark Floating …
2leads
ECCVEagle Point Credit Co…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PFLTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ECCV4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PFLT4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ECCV6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ECCV5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ECCV2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
PFLT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECCV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFLT and ECCV operate at a comparable scale, with $172M and $116M in trailing revenue. ECCV is the more profitable business, keeping 69.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFLT's 38.7%.
| Metric | ECCVEagle Point Credi… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $116M | $172M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $242M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.2% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +73.7% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +89.3% | +55.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +40.9% |
ECCV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PFLT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, PFLT trades at a 55% valuation discount to ECCV's 27.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ECCV's 28.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFLT's 37.7x.
| Metric | ECCVEagle Point Credi… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $888M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.88x | 12.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.88x | 37.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.31x | 5.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.39x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.63x | 9.34x |
PFLT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ECCV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFLT delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for ECCV. ECCV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFLT's 1.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFLT scores 4/9 vs ECCV's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ECCVEagle Point Credi… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $230M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $123M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $272M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.34x | 0.35x |
ECCV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECCV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECCV five years ago would be worth $12,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,718 for PFLT. Over the past 12 months, ECCV leads with a +11.4% total return vs PFLT's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECCV at 8.9% vs PFLT's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ECCVEagle Point Credi… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | -0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.4% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | +18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | +72.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +5.7% |
ECCV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ECCV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ECCV is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFLT's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECCV currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs PFLT's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ECCVEagle Point Credi… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.37 | $10.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.45 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 68.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 987K |
ECCV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, PFLT offers the higher dividend yield at 13.47% vs ECCV's 7.32%.
| Metric | ECCVEagle Point Credi… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.3% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.75 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ECCV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFLT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallEagle Point Credit Company … (ECCV)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ECCV vs PFLT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECCV or PFLT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCV). PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECCV or PFLT?
On trailing P/E, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. at 27. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECCV or PFLT?
Over the past 5 years, Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
(ECCV) delivered a total return of +20. 2%, compared to +17. 2% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFLT returned +72. 6% versus ECCV's +20. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECCV or PFLT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
(ECCV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. 's 0. 79β — meaning PFLT is approximately 44% more volatile than ECCV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 165% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECCV or PFLT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -14. 9% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. grew EPS -48. 6% year-over-year, compared to -50. 6% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECCV or PFLT?
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
(ECCV) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 3% net margin versus 38. 7% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — meaning it keeps 69. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECCV leads at 73. 7% versus 39. 4% for PFLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ECCV leads at 84. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ECCV or PFLT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the highest yield at 13. 5%, versus 7. 3% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCV).
08Is ECCV or PFLT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
(ECCV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 7. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ECCV: +20. 2%, PFLT: +72. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ECCV and PFLT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ECCV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFLT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ECCV: -14.9% · PFLT: 2.2%)Net Margin>
%
(ECCV: 69.3% · PFLT: 38.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ECCV: 27.9x · PFLT: 12.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.