Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ECO vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
ECO vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $529.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $392M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $123M | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 49.4% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 41.5% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.2x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $605M | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $24.81B |
ECO vs SPIR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okeanis Eco Tankers… (ECO) | 100 | 644.3 | +544.3% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECO vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ECO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 3.8%
- Rev growth -0.4%, EPS growth 11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
In this particular matchup, SPIR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.4% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.4% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +148.2% vs SPIR's +73.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 11.8% vs -0.1% |
ECO vs SPIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ECO vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECO is the larger business by revenue, generating $392M annually — 5.5x SPIR's $72M. ECO is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ECO holds the edge at +48.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $392M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $204M | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $123M | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $71M | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.4% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ECO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 33% valuation discount to ECO's 15.0x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $529.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $513.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.04x | 10.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.65x | 7405.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.22x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.13x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ECO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ECO delivers a 21.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECO's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ECO scores 6/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.5% | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.2% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.8% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.2% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $488M | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $605M | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.88x | 9.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECO five years ago would be worth $84,891 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ECO leads with a +148.2% total return vs SPIR's +73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECO at 48.6% vs SPIR's 43.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +82.3% | +106.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +148.2% | +73.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.4% | +198.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +748.9% | -79.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +944.3% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.6% | +43.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ECO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ECO is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECO currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.49 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.27 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ECO as "Buy" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.0% upside for SPIR (target: $17) vs -22.4% for ECO (target: $44). ECO is the only dividend payer here at 3.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ECO leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
ECO vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECO or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
(ECO) is the stronger pick with -0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECO or SPIR?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECO or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
(ECO) delivered a total return of +748. 9%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ECO returned +944. 3% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECO or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
(ECO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 801% more volatile than ECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 106% for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECO or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
(ECO) is pulling ahead at -0. 4% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 11. 5% for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ECO leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECO or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 31. 4% for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECO leads at 41. 5% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ECO leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ECO or SPIR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPIR: 7.
0% to $17. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ECO or SPIR?
In this comparison, ECO (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ECO or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
(ECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 3. 8% yield, +944. 3% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ECO: +944. 3%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ECO and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ECO pays a dividend while SPIR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.