EDUC vs PRTS

For growth investors, CarParts.

com, Inc. (PRTS) is the stronger pick with -7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 0% for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) delivered a total return of -89.

3%, compared to -94. 4% for CarParts. com, Inc. (PRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDUC returned -59. 9% versus PRTS's -73. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

66β versus CarParts. com, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning PRTS is approximately 93% more volatile than EDUC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CarParts. com, Inc. (PRTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 80% for Educational Development Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CarParts.

com, Inc. (PRTS) is pulling ahead at -7. 0% versus -33. 0% for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarParts. com, Inc. grew EPS -15. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1071. 2% for Educational Development Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRTS leads at -6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CarParts.

com, Inc. (PRTS) is the more profitable company, earning -9. 2% net margin versus -15. 4% for Educational Development Corporation — meaning it keeps -9. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTS leads at -8. 9% versus -19. 8% for EDUC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDUC leads at 61. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

66)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDUC: -59. 9%, PRTS: -73. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (EDUC (Communication Services) and PRTS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.