EE
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
Renewable Utilities
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+26.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EE vs LNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$54.93B
5Y Perf.+92.5%
EE vs LNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $54.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $434.35B | $19.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $68.93B | $5.33B |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 36.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 30.2% |
| Forward P/E | 21.2x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $28.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $541M | $1.58B |
EE vs LNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EE
LNG
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excelerate Energy, … (EE) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| Cheniere Energy, In… (LNG) | 100 | 192.5 | +92.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EE vs LNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Cheniere Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EE
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
The Income Pick
EE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 44.3%, EPS growth 0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 64.2%, current ratio 2.43x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
LNG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs EE's 30.0%
- Lower P/E (17.5x vs 21.2x)
- 27.0% margin vs EE's 15.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EE | 44.3% revenue growth vs LNG's 24.4% |
| Value | LNG | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 21.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | LNG | 27.0% margin vs EE's 15.9% |
| Stability / Safety | EE | Lower D/E ratio (64.2% vs 218.8%) |
| Dividends | EE | 0.8% yield, vs LNG's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | EE | +35.0% vs LNG's +12.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LNG | 11.7% ROA vs EE's 6.6%, ROIC 10.9% vs 8.7% |
EE vs LNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
EE vs LNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLNGLAGGINGEE
EEExcelerate Energy, In…
1leads
LNGCheniere Energy, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs EEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LNG5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EE3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LNG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LNG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
LNG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EE is the larger business by revenue, generating $434.4B annually — 22.0x LNG's $19.7B. LNG is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EE's 15.9%. On growth, EE holds the edge at +1374.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $434.4B | $19.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $113.3B | $7.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $68.9B | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32.8B | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +36.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +30.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1374.6% | +19.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.6% | +146.7% |
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, LNG trades at a 60% valuation discount to EE's 26.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EE's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LNG's 11.3x.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $54.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $82.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.77x | 10.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.24x | 17.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.62x | 11.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.47x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.32x |
EE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG delivers a 46.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $7 for EE. EE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNG's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNG scores 7/9 vs EE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | +46.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 2.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $889M | $27.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $541M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $28.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.07x | 9.74x |
LNG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNG five years ago would be worth $33,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,000 for EE. Over the past 12 months, EE leads with a +35.0% total return vs LNG's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNG at 21.3% vs EE's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | +32.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.7% | +78.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +234.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +695.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.1% | +21.3% |
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EE's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNG currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs EE's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | -0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.17 | $300.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.29 | $186.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 468K | 3.2M |
LNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EE and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EE as "Buy" and LNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for EE (target: $42) vs 1.5% for LNG (target: $265). For income investors, EE offers the higher dividend yield at 0.81% vs LNG's 0.78%.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | LNGCheniere Energy, … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $265.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $2.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% |
Evenly matched — EE and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
LNG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallCheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EE vs LNG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EE or LNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Excelerate Energy, Inc.
(EE) is the stronger pick with 44. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 4% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EE or LNG?
On trailing P/E, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Excelerate Energy, Inc. at 26. 8x. On forward P/E, Cheniere Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EE or LNG?
Over the past 5 years, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) delivered a total return of +234. 7%, compared to +30. 0% for Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNG returned +695. 9% versus EE's +30. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EE or LNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus Excelerate Energy, Inc. 's 0. 55β — meaning EE is approximately -268% more volatile than LNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 2% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EE or LNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Excelerate Energy, Inc.
(EE) is pulling ahead at 44. 3% versus 24. 4% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheniere Energy, Inc. grew EPS 69. 9% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for Excelerate Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNG leads at -16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EE or LNG?
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 1% net margin versus 3. 2% for Excelerate Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNG leads at 27. 0% versus 24. 5% for EE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EE leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EE or LNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for Excelerate Energy, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EE: 22. 6% to $42. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EE or LNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 8% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).
09Is EE or LNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33), 0. 8% yield, +695. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNG: +695. 9%, EE: +30. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EE and LNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (EE (Utilities) and LNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EE: 137460.4% · LNG: 19.8%)Net Margin>
%
(EE: 15.9% · LNG: 27.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(EE: 26.8x · LNG: 10.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.