EFTY
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., LTD
Asset Management
Market Cap$227M
5Y Perf.+25.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EFTY vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$133M
5Y Perf.+111.3%
UTSI
UTStarcom Holdings Corp.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$24M
5Y Perf.-64.5%
EFTY vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EFTY | CLPS | CODA | UTSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $227M | $27M | $133M | $24M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $299M | $28M | $10M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $852K | $-4M | $4M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 78.8% | 22.8% | 66.3% | 19.8% |
| Operating Margin | 39.6% | -1.4% | 17.4% | -80.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 22.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $53K | $34M | $395K | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $28M | $29M | $51M |
EFTY vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EFTY
CLPS
CODA
UTSI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 211.3 | +111.3% |
| UTStarcom Holdings … (UTSI) | 100 | 35.5 | -64.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFTY vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EFTY leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CLPS and UTSI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EFTY
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., LTD
The Banking Pick
EFTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 33.8% margin vs UTSI's -62.0%
- +207.8% vs CLPS's -6.9%
- 41.2% ROA vs UTSI's -9.3%, ROIC 79.7% vs -32.7%
Best for: quality and momentum
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 13.9%
- 13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
CODA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs EFTY's 207.8%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs UTSI's -30.9%
- Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
UTSI
UTStarcom Holdings Corp.
The Defensive Pick
UTSI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 2.92x
- Beta 0.18, current ratio 2.92x
- Beta 0.18 vs CODA's 0.99
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CODA | 30.7% revenue growth vs UTSI's -30.9% |
| Value | CODA | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | EFTY | 33.8% margin vs UTSI's -62.0% |
| Stability / Safety | UTSI | Beta 0.18 vs CODA's 0.99 |
| Dividends | CLPS | 13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EFTY | +207.8% vs CLPS's -6.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EFTY | 41.2% ROA vs UTSI's -9.3%, ROIC 79.7% vs -32.7% |
EFTY vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
EFTY vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEFTYLAGGINGUTSI
Who Leads Where
EFTY leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 1 • CODA leads 0 • UTSI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓UTSIUTStarcom Holdings Co…
0leads
CODACoda Octopus Group, I…
0leads
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
1leads
EFTYETOILES CAPITAL GROUP…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CLPSvs CODAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EFTY4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EFTY6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EFTY4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CLPS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 118.4x EFTY's $3M. EFTY is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UTSI's -62.0%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | UTSIUTStarcom Holding… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $299M | $28M | $10M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$1M | $6M | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$4M | $4M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 | $7M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.8% | +22.8% | +66.3% | +19.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | -1.4% | +17.4% | -80.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | -1.3% | +14.8% | -62.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | -2.3% | +24.6% | -67.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +15.3% | +28.8% | -19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +75.8% | +3.0% | -81.8% |
EFTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CODA's 17.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EFTY's 209.7x.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | UTSIUTStarcom Holding… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $227M | $27M | $133M | $24M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $226M | $32M | $105M | -$25M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -3.65x | 31.97x | -5.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.32x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 209.68x | — | 17.72x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 89.85x | 0.16x | 5.02x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.45x | 2.29x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 146.64x | — | 22.07x | — |
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EFTY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EFTY delivers a 96.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $96 in annual profit, vs $-14 for UTSI. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EFTY scores 8/9 vs UTSI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | UTSIUTStarcom Holding… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +96.0% | -6.1% | +7.2% | -13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +41.2% | -3.2% | +6.6% | -9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +79.7% | -7.9% | +11.2% | -32.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +112.1% | -9.8% | +8.1% | -14.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.59x | 0.01x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $6M | -$28M | -$49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $28M | $29M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53,418 | $34M | $394,932 | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 265.41x | — | — | — |
EFTY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EFTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EFTY five years ago would be worth $30,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,289 for CLPS. Over the past 12 months, EFTY leads with a +207.8% total return vs CLPS's -6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EFTY at 45.5% vs UTSI's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | UTSIUTStarcom Holding… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -5.9% | +24.4% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +207.8% | -6.9% | +75.8% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.8% | +4.4% | +36.6% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.8% | -67.1% | +52.6% | -46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.8% | -77.7% | +745.0% | -66.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.5% | +1.5% | +11.0% | -11.3% |
EFTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EFTY and UTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFTY is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CODA's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UTSI currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs CLPS's 50.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | UTSIUTStarcom Holding… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.29x | 0.19x | 0.99x | 0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.20 | $1.88 | $17.28 | $2.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.88 | $0.80 | $5.98 | $2.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.5% | +50.5% | +68.5% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.7 | 47.7 | 50.9 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 15K | 253K | 5K |
Evenly matched — EFTY and UTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 13.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | UTSIUTStarcom Holding… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +13.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
EFTY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., … (EFTY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EFTY vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFTY or CLPS or CODA or UTSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 9% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 0x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EFTY or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
Over the past 5 years, ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) delivered a total return of +207. 8%, compared to -67. 1% for CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +745. 0% versus CLPS's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EFTY or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 29β versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning CODA is approximately -438% more volatile than EFTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EFTY or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -30. 9% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EFTY or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 8% net margin versus -40. 2% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 33. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EFTY leads at 39. 6% versus -67. 4% for UTSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EFTY leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EFTY or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
In this comparison, CLPS (13.
9% yield) pays a dividend. EFTY, CODA, UTSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is EFTY or CLPS or CODA or UTSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 29), +207. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFTY: +207. 8%, CODA: +745. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EFTY and CLPS and CODA and UTSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFTY (Financial Services) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and UTSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EFTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; UTSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while EFTY, CODA, UTSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.