Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON vs CODA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EFTY
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., LTD

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$227M
5Y Perf.+25.2%
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$15M
5Y Perf.-97.7%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$133M
5Y Perf.+111.3%

EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON vs CODA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EFTY logoEFTY
FTFT logoFTFT
CLPS logoCLPS
RCON logoRCON
CODA logoCODA
IndustryAsset ManagementSoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$227M$6M$27M$15M$133M
Revenue (TTM)$3M$4M$299M$66M$28M
Net Income (TTM)$852K$-5M$-4M$-43M$4M
Gross Margin78.8%10.7%22.8%23.0%66.3%
Operating Margin39.6%-8.9%-1.4%-86.5%17.4%
Forward P/E22.3x
Total Debt$53K$2M$34M$34M$395K
Cash & Equiv.$1M$2M$28M$99M$29M

EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON vs CODALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EFTY
FTFT
CLPS
RCON
CODA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT)1001.9-98.1%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10050.8-49.2%
Recon Technology, L… (RCON)1002.3-97.7%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100211.3+111.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON vs CODA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EFTY leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. FTFT and CODA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EFTY
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., LTD
The Banking Pick

EFTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • 33.8% margin vs FTFT's -120.6%
  • +207.8% vs RCON's -60.3%
  • 41.2% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC 79.7% vs -97.5%
Best for: quality and momentum
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
The Growth Play

FTFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
  • 77.5% revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7%
Best for: growth exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 13.9%
  • Beta 0.19, yield 13.9%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19 vs FTFT's 2.36
  • 13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and defensive
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RCON doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CODA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 7.4% 10Y total return vs EFTY's 207.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFTFT logoFTFT77.5% revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7%
ValueCODA logoCODABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsEFTY logoEFTY33.8% margin vs FTFT's -120.6%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.19 vs FTFT's 2.36
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EFTY logoEFTY+207.8% vs RCON's -60.3%
Efficiency (ROA)EFTY logoEFTY41.2% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC 79.7% vs -97.5%

EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EFTYETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., LTD

Segment breakdown not available.

FTFTFuture FinTech Group Inc.
FY 2023
Other Segments
100.0%$1M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
FY 2025
Automation product and software
75.7%$29M
Oilfield environmental protection
22.6%$9M
Platform Outsourcing Services
1.7%$642,405
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912

EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON vs CODA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEFTYLAGGINGCODA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — EFTY and FTFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 118.4x EFTY's $3M. EFTY is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTFT's -120.6%. On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEFTY logoEFTYETOILES CAPITAL G…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$4M$299M$66M$28M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$34M-$1M-$54M$6M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M-$4M-$43M$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$56.6B$0-$44M$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.8%+10.7%+22.8%+23.0%+66.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.6%-8.9%-1.4%-86.5%+17.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+33.8%-120.6%-1.3%-64.3%+14.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+61.3%+14767.2%-2.3%-65.9%+24.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+110.9%+15.3%+2.6%+28.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%+75.8%+35.7%+3.0%
Evenly matched — EFTY and FTFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CODA's 17.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EFTY's 209.7x.

MetricEFTY logoEFTYETOILES CAPITAL G…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Market CapShares × price$227M$6M$27M$15M$133M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$226M$5M$32M$6M$105M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.48x-3.65x-1.09x31.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.32x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.46x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple209.68x17.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue89.85x1.48x0.16x1.54x5.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.05x0.45x0.10x2.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF146.64x22.07x
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EFTY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

EFTY delivers a 96.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $96 in annual profit, vs $-16 for FTFT. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EFTY scores 8/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEFTY logoEFTYETOILES CAPITAL G…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+96.0%-16.4%-6.1%-9.2%+7.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+41.2%-11.9%-3.2%-8.0%+6.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+79.7%-97.5%-7.9%-10.6%+11.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+112.1%-117.5%-9.8%-11.8%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985247
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.04x0.59x0.08x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$457,223$6M-$64M-$28M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$2M$28M$99M$29M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$53,418$2M$34M$34M$394,932
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense265.41x-228.78x-372.30x
EFTY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EFTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EFTY five years ago would be worth $30,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $48 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, EFTY leads with a +207.8% total return vs RCON's -60.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EFTY at 45.5% vs FTFT's -53.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEFTY logoEFTYETOILES CAPITAL G…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date0.0%+49.3%-5.9%-51.6%+24.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+207.8%-31.7%-6.9%-60.3%+75.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+207.8%-90.1%+4.4%-89.7%+36.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+207.8%-99.2%-67.1%-99.5%+52.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+207.8%-98.9%-77.7%-99.3%+745.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+45.5%-53.7%+1.5%-53.1%+11.0%
EFTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EFTY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EFTY is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EFTY currently trades 82.5% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 10.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEFTY logoEFTYETOILES CAPITAL G…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.29x2.36x0.19x0.49x0.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.20$4.03$1.88$7.16$17.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.88$0.56$0.80$0.73$5.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.5%+27.8%+50.5%+10.5%+68.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10073.740.947.734.250.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.6M110K15K77K253K
EFTY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 13.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEFTY logoEFTYETOILES CAPITAL G…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+13.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1310
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

EFTY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., … (EFTY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON vs CODA: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON or CODA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.

(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 0x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON or CODA?

Over the past 5 years, ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.

, LTD (EFTY) delivered a total return of +207. 8%, compared to -99. 5% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +745. 0% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON or CODA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.

, LTD (EFTY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 29β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning FTFT is approximately -903% more volatile than EFTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON or CODA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.

(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON or CODA?

ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.

, LTD (EFTY) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 8% net margin versus -120. 6% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EFTY leads at 39. 6% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EFTY leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON or CODA?

In this comparison, CLPS (13.

9% yield) pays a dividend. EFTY, FTFT, RCON, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.

, LTD (EFTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 29), +207. 8% 10Y return). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFTY: +207. 8%, FTFT: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between EFTY and FTFT and CLPS and RCON and CODA?

These companies operate in different sectors (EFTY (Financial Services) and FTFT (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and RCON (Energy) and CODA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EFTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while EFTY, FTFT, RCON, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EFTY

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FTFT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.