Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EFXT vs AROC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
EFXT vs AROC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $3.29B | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.35B | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111M | $325M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 45.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 25.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.9x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $702M | $2.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $2M |
EFXT vs AROC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) | 100 | 667.9 | +567.9% |
| Archrock, Inc. (AROC) | 100 | 615.7 | +515.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFXT vs AROC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFXT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (13.9x vs 19.8x)
- +307.9% vs AROC's +66.9%
AROC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 28.7%, EPS growth 75.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.8%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs EFXT's 281.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.7% revenue growth vs EFXT's 8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 19.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.4% margin vs EFXT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs EFXT's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs EFXT's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +307.9% vs AROC's +66.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs EFXT's 3.6%, ROIC 11.6% vs 13.7% |
EFXT vs AROC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EFXT vs AROC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AROC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFXT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 2.2x AROC's $1.5B. AROC is the more profitable business, keeping 21.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFXT's 3.3%. On growth, AROC holds the edge at +7.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $456M | $789M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $111M | $325M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $259M | $358M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +45.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +25.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +21.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.9% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.0% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
EFXT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.3x trailing earnings, AROC trades at a 58% valuation discount to EFXT's 51.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AROC's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EFXT's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.04x | 21.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.89x | 19.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.72x | 11.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 4.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.05x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.09x | 57.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EFXT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AROC delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $9 for EFXT. EFXT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AROC's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EFXT scores 8/9 vs AROC's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +11.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.1% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $621M | $2.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $702M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.52x | 2.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EFXT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AROC five years ago would be worth $43,953 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $42,597 for EFXT. Over the past 12 months, EFXT leads with a +307.9% total return vs AROC's +66.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EFXT at 62.3% vs AROC's 61.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +69.9% | +47.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +307.9% | +66.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +327.7% | +322.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +326.0% | +339.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +281.7% | +512.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.3% | +61.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AROC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AROC is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EFXT's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.34 | $40.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.46 | $21.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +97.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.9 | 75.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 430K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
AROC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EFXT as "Buy" and AROC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.3% upside for AROC (target: $40) vs -15.9% for EFXT (target: $23). For income investors, AROC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.07% vs EFXT's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.75 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +1.0% |
AROC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). EFXT leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
EFXT vs AROC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFXT or AROC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the stronger pick with 28. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). Archrock, Inc. (AROC) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFXT or AROC?
On trailing P/E, Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Enerflex Ltd. at 51. 0x. On forward P/E, Enerflex Ltd. is actually cheaper at 13. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFXT or AROC?
Over the past 5 years, Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) delivered a total return of +339. 5%, compared to +326. 0% for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AROC returned +512. 9% versus EFXT's +281. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFXT or AROC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Enerflex Ltd. 's 0. 97β — meaning EFXT is approximately 7% more volatile than AROC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 162% for Archrock, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFXT or AROC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is pulling ahead at 28. 7% versus 8. 3% for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enerflex Ltd. grew EPS 103. 8% year-over-year, compared to 75. 2% for Archrock, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AROC leads at 20. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFXT or AROC?
Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 2. 5% for Enerflex Ltd. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AROC leads at 38. 7% versus 12. 1% for EFXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AROC leads at 48. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFXT or AROC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Enerflex Ltd.
(EFXT) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for Archrock, Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AROC: 2. 3% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFXT or AROC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Archrock, Inc. (AROC) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 5% for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT).
09Is EFXT or AROC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), 2. 1% yield, +512. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AROC: +512. 9%, EFXT: +281. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFXT and AROC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EFXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AROC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.