Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EH vs EVTL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
EH vs EVTL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $406M | $274M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $431M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-288M | $-245M |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -77.1% | — |
| Total Debt | $233M | $191M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $611M | $70M |
EH vs EVTL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EHang Holdings Limi… (EH) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| Vertical Aerospace … (EVTL) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EH vs EVTL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.78
- -16.7% 10Y total return vs EVTL's -97.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.78, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 2.89x
EVTL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 98.5%
- 2.5% margin vs EH's -66.7%
- -35.0% vs EH's -44.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 294.0% revenue growth vs EVTL's 92.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs EH's -66.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.78 vs EVTL's 3.45 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.0% vs EH's -44.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -16.7% ROA vs EVTL's -229.7% |
EH vs EVTL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EH vs EVTL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVTL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EH and EVTL operate at a comparable scale, with $431M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $431M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$277M | -$146M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$288M | -$245M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$97M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -182.1% | -106.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $406M | $274M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $351M | $439M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.36x | -3.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.98x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.49x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.24x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EH scores 8/9 vs EVTL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.7% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.4% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$377M | $121M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $611M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $233M | $191M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -58.21x | -42.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EH five years ago would be worth $4,439 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $273 for EVTL. Over the past 12 months, EVTL leads with a -35.0% total return vs EH's -44.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EH at 0.1% vs EVTL's -46.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.9% | -54.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.5% | -35.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | -84.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | -97.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.7% | -97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.1% | -46.0% |
Risk & Volatility
EH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EH is the less volatile stock with a 1.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVTL's 3.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EH currently trades 49.9% from its 52-week high vs EVTL's 35.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 3.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.85 | $7.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.05 | $1.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.9% | +35.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 587K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EH as "Buy" and EVTL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 310.4% upside for EVTL (target: $11) vs 108.9% for EH (target: $22).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.75 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
EH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). EVTL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
EH vs EVTL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EH or EVTL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate EHang Holdings Limited (EH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EH or EVTL?
Over the past 5 years, EHang Holdings Limited (EH) delivered a total return of -55.
6%, compared to -97. 3% for Vertical Aerospace Ltd. (EVTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EH returned -16. 7% versus EVTL's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EH or EVTL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EHang Holdings Limited (EH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
78β versus Vertical Aerospace Ltd. 's 3. 45β — meaning EVTL is approximately 94% more volatile than EH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — EH or EVTL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertical Aerospace Ltd.
grew EPS 98. 5% year-over-year, compared to -37. 9% for EHang Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EH or EVTL?
Vertical Aerospace Ltd.
(EVTL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -50. 4% for EHang Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTL leads at 0. 0% versus -62. 2% for EH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EH leads at 59. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EH or EVTL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is EH or EVTL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EHang Holdings Limited (EH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Vertical Aerospace Ltd. (EVTL) carries a higher beta of 3. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EH: -16. 7%, EVTL: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EH and EVTL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EH is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.