EICB
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
Asset Management - Income
Market Cap—
5Y Perf.+0.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EICB vs PFLT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
Asset Management
Market Cap$888M
5Y Perf.-18.5%
EICB vs PFLT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EICB | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Income | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | — | $888M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $172M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 94.1% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 107.6% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $1.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $123M |
EICB vs PFLT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EICB
PFLT
| Stock | Jul 23 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Point Income … (EICB) | 100 | 100.3 | +0.3% |
| PennantPark Floatin… (PFLT) | 100 | 81.5 | -18.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EICB vs PFLT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PFLT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Eagle Point Income Company Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EICB
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
The Banking Pick
EICB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 70.7%, EPS growth -8.8%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.01, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 224.31x
- PEG 0.50 vs PFLT's 0.89
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
The Banking Pick
PFLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.5%
- 72.6% 10Y total return vs EICB's 19.2%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 8.9x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EICB | 70.7% NII/revenue growth vs PFLT's 2.2% |
| Value | PFLT | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 8.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | PFLT | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs EICB's 0.1% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety | EICB | Lower D/E ratio (0.6% vs 165.4%) |
| Dividends | PFLT | 13.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs EICB's 9.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | EICB | +5.1% vs PFLT's +1.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PFLT | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs EICB's 0.1% |
EICB vs PFLT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEICBLAGGINGPFLT
PFLTPennantPark Floating …
1leads
EICBEagle Point Income Co…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PFLTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EICB3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EICB2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EICB6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EICB4/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
EICB2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
PFLT1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EICB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFLT is the larger business by revenue, generating $172M annually — 3.8x EICB's $46M. EICB is the more profitable business, keeping 91.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFLT's 38.7%.
| Metric | EICBEagle Point Incom… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $172M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | $242M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.1% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +107.6% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +91.0% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +55.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.3% | +40.9% |
EICB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EICB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, EICB trades at a 29% valuation discount to PFLT's 12.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EICB offers better value at 0.50x vs PFLT's 1.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | EICBEagle Point Incom… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $888M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.89x | 12.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.50x | 1.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 37.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.34x |
EICB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EICB leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFLT delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for EICB. EICB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFLT's 1.65x.
| Metric | EICBEagle Point Incom… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.0% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $123M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.51x | 0.35x |
EICB leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EICB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EICB five years ago would be worth $11,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,718 for PFLT. Over the past 12 months, EICB leads with a +5.1% total return vs PFLT's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EICB at 6.0% vs PFLT's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EICBEagle Point Incom… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.1% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +72.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +5.7% |
EICB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EICB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EICB is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFLT's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EICB currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs PFLT's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EICBEagle Point Incom… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.00x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.30 | $10.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.64 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 68.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 987K |
EICB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
PFLT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, PFLT offers the higher dividend yield at 13.47% vs EICB's 9.30%.
| Metric | EICBEagle Point Incom… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.32 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% |
PFLT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
EICB leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PFLT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallEagle Point Income Company … (EICB)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EICB vs PFLT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EICB or PFLT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EICB) is the stronger pick with 70. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICB) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EICB or PFLT?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EICB) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. at 12. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EICB or PFLT?
Over the past 5 years, Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EICB) delivered a total return of +19. 2%, compared to +17. 2% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFLT returned +72. 4% versus EICB's +19. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EICB or PFLT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EICB) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 00β versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. 's 0. 78β — meaning PFLT is approximately -35341% more volatile than EICB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 165% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EICB or PFLT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EICB) is pulling ahead at 70. 7% versus 2. 2% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Point Income Company Inc. grew EPS -8. 8% year-over-year, compared to -48. 6% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EICB or PFLT?
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EICB) is the more profitable company, earning 91. 0% net margin versus 38. 7% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — meaning it keeps 91. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EICB leads at 107. 6% versus 39. 4% for PFLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EICB leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — EICB or PFLT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the highest yield at 13. 5%, versus 9. 3% for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICB).
08Is EICB or PFLT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EICB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 9. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EICB: +19. 2%, PFLT: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EICB and PFLT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EICB is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFLT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EICB: 70.7% · PFLT: 2.2%)Net Margin>
%
(EICB: 91.0% · PFLT: 38.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(EICB: 8.9x · PFLT: 12.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.