ELC vs ETR vs SO vs DUK vs D

For growth investors, Dominion Energy, Inc.

(D) is the stronger pick with 14. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 2% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Entergy Corporation (ETR) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) is the cheapest at 5.

1x versus Entergy Corporation at 28. 4x. On forward P/E, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT wins at 0. 01x versus Entergy Corporation's 9. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Entergy Corporation (ETR) delivered a total return of +123.

9%, compared to +2. 0% for Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETR returned +236. 4% versus ELC's +27. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

23β versus Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT's 0. 75β — meaning ELC is approximately -428% more volatile than DUK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 146% versus 180% for Entergy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dominion Energy, Inc.

(D) is pulling ahead at 14. 2% versus 6. 2% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT grew EPS 59. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, D leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Dominion Energy, Inc.

(D) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus 13. 7% for Entergy Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: D leads at 26. 7% versus 23. 6% for ETR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — D leads at 49. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Entergy Corporation's 9. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Entergy Corporation — 25. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ETR: 8. 3% to $120. 31.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) offers the highest yield at 11. 9%, versus 2. 1% for Entergy Corporation (ETR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

23), 3. 4% yield, +101. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DUK: +101. 3%, ELC: +27. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ELC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ETR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DUK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; D is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.