Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ELPC vs ELP vs CIG vs SBS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ELPC
Companhia Paranaense de Energia

Diversified Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$2.29B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
ELP
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL

Diversified Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.+25.8%
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais

Diversified Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$6.84B
5Y Perf.+34.3%
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Regulated Water

UtilitiesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$21.77B
5Y Perf.+108.9%

ELPC vs ELP vs CIG vs SBS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ELPC logoELPC
ELP logoELP
CIG logoCIG
SBS logoSBS
IndustryDiversified UtilitiesDiversified UtilitiesDiversified UtilitiesRegulated Water
Market Cap$2.29B$7M$6.84B$21.77B
Revenue (TTM)$27.27B$24.95B$42.79B$37.34B
Net Income (TTM)$2.72B$2.21B$4.93B$8.30B
Gross Margin25.5%17.3%14.3%36.6%
Operating Margin19.0%31.3%11.7%32.2%
Forward P/E3.1x3.0x1.9x0.7x
Total Debt$20.31B$17.57B$19.87B$39.99B
Cash & Equiv.$3.13B$4.16B$1.90B$4.67B

ELPC vs ELP vs CIG vs SBSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ELPC
ELP
CIG
SBS
StockDec 23May 26Return
Companhia Paranaens… (ELPC)100156.6+56.6%
Companhia Paranaens… (ELP)100125.8+25.8%
Companhia Energétic… (CIG)100134.3+34.3%
Companhia de Saneam… (SBS)100208.9+108.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ELPC vs ELP vs CIG vs SBS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ELPC and SBS are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. ELP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ELPC
Companhia Paranaense de Energia
The Income Pick

ELPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 21.8%
  • Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth -17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
  • 13.0% revenue growth vs SBS's 3.3%
  • 21.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ELP's 4.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ELP
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL
The Defensive Pick

ELP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 68.6%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.56, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.56 vs ELPC's 0.91, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
The Income Angle

CIG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: utilities exposure
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
The Long-Run Compounder

SBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • 5.3% 10Y total return vs ELP's 334.7%
  • PEG 0.01 vs ELPC's 0.12
  • Lower P/E (0.7x vs 1.9x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.11
  • 22.2% margin vs ELP's 8.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthELPC logoELPC13.0% revenue growth vs SBS's 3.3%
ValueSBS logoSBSLower P/E (0.7x vs 1.9x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.11
Quality / MarginsSBS logoSBS22.2% margin vs ELP's 8.9%
Stability / SafetyELP logoELPBeta 0.56 vs ELPC's 0.91, lower leverage
DividendsELPC logoELPC21.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ELP's 4.3%
Momentum (1Y)ELPC logoELPC+75.9% vs ELP's +19.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SBS logoSBS8.8% ROA vs ELP's 3.6%, ROIC 13.1% vs 8.4%

ELPC vs ELP vs CIG vs SBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ELPCCompanhia Paranaense de Energia

Segment breakdown not available.

ELPCompanhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL

Segment breakdown not available.

CIGCompanhia Energética de Minas Gerais
FY 2020
Receivables from Customers and Traders
39.8%$127M
Reimbursement For Suspension Of Supply Of Power
16.3%$52M
Transactions With Energy
11.0%$35M
Securities
10.3%$33M
Accounts Receivable - AFAC
8.5%$27M
ICMS Tax - Early Payment
3.8%$12M
Reimbursement For Cessation Of Power Purchase Agreement
3.1%$10M
Other (4)
7.2%$23M
SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Segment breakdown not available.

ELPC vs ELP vs CIG vs SBS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSBSLAGGINGCIG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CIG is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.8B annually — 1.7x ELP's $24.9B. SBS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELP's 8.9%. On growth, ELP holds the edge at +18.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricELPC logoELPCCompanhia Paranae…ELP logoELPCompanhia Paranae…CIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$27.3B$24.9B$42.8B$37.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.7B$9.3B$6.5B$14.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.7B$2.2B$4.9B$8.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$354M-$3.7B-$2.6B$13.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.5%+17.3%+14.3%+36.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.0%+31.3%+11.7%+32.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.0%+8.9%+11.5%+22.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.3%-14.6%-6.0%+35.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.7%+18.8%-5.1%-26.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.3%-70.7%+88.6%+10.6%
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ELP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.0x trailing earnings, ELP trades at a 77% valuation discount to SBS's 13.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ELPC offers better value at 0.16x vs CIG's 0.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricELPC logoELPCCompanhia Paranae…ELP logoELPCompanhia Paranae…CIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
Market CapShares × price$2.3B$7M$6.8B$21.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.8B$13.4B$10.5B$28.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS4.28x2.97x6.96x13.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.13x1.85x0.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.16x0.62x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.78x2.46x7.00x10.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.44x0.00x0.81x2.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.49x0.27x1.18x2.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.10x
ELP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

SBS delivers a 20.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $9 for ELP. ELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBS's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELPC scores 5/9 vs SBS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricELPC logoELPCCompanhia Paranae…ELP logoELPCompanhia Paranae…CIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.1%+8.5%+17.3%+20.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.4%+3.6%+7.6%+8.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.5%+8.4%+10.5%+13.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.4%+8.7%+12.0%+15.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95443
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.88x0.69x0.70x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$17.2B$13.4B$18.0B$35.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3.1B$4.2B$1.9B$4.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$20.3B$17.6B$19.9B$40.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.80x1.94x3.75x2.86x
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SBS five years ago would be worth $51,513 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,269 for ELPC. Over the past 12 months, ELPC leads with a +75.9% total return vs ELP's +19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBS at 62.2% vs CIG's 17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricELPC logoELPCCompanhia Paranae…ELP logoELPCompanhia Paranae…CIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+46.3%+17.8%+34.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+75.9%+19.7%+45.5%+73.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.7%+72.1%+63.8%+326.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.7%+166.8%+137.5%+415.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.7%+334.7%+315.8%+528.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.0%+19.8%+17.9%+62.2%
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ELPC and ELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELPC's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ELPC currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs SBS's 23.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricELPC logoELPCCompanhia Paranae…ELP logoELPCompanhia Paranae…CIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x0.56x0.72x0.82x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.65$11.23$2.76$26.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.32$8.07$1.75$3.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.3%+82.5%+86.6%+23.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.444.142.552.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded405K756K6.6M19.2M
Evenly matched — ELPC and ELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ELPC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CIG as "Buy", SBS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 273.5% upside for SBS (target: $24) vs -15.6% for ELPC (target: $10). For income investors, ELPC offers the higher dividend yield at 21.84% vs SBS's 2.15%.

MetricELPC logoELPCCompanhia Paranae…ELP logoELPCompanhia Paranae…CIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.40$2.10$23.79
# AnalystsCovering analysts57
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+21.8%+4.3%+11.5%+2.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$13.32$0.39$1.36$0.68
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+100.0%0.0%+0.4%
ELPC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SBS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ELP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallCompanhia de Saneamento Bás… (SBS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ELPC vs ELP vs CIG vs SBS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) is the stronger pick with 13.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) offers the better valuation at 3. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS?

On trailing P/E, Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) is the cheapest at 3.

0x versus Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP wins at 0. 01x versus Companhia Paranaense de Energia's 0. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS?

Over the past 5 years, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) delivered a total return of +415.

1%, compared to +72. 7% for Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBS returned +528. 6% versus ELPC's +72. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

56β versus Companhia Paranaense de Energia's 0. 91β — meaning ELPC is approximately 64% more volatile than ELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 94% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) is pulling ahead at 13.

0% versus 3. 3% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL grew EPS 6. 8% year-over-year, compared to -31. 7% for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBS leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS?

Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

2% net margin versus 10. 3% for Companhia Paranaense de Energia — meaning it keeps 22. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBS leads at 32. 2% versus 14. 1% for CIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBS leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Companhia Paranaense de Energia's 0. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 3. 1x for Companhia Paranaense de Energia — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBS: 273. 5% to $23. 79.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) offers the highest yield at 21. 8%, versus 2. 1% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS).

09

Is ELPC or ELP or CIG or SBS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

56), 4. 3% yield, +334. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELP: +334. 7%, ELPC: +72. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ELPC and ELP and CIG and SBS?

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ELPC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ELP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBS

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ELPC and ELP and CIG and SBS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ELPC: 17.7% · ELP: 18.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(ELPC: 10.0% · ELP: 8.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ELPC: 4.3x · ELP: 3.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.