Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ELVA vs MVST vs CBAT vs SLDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
ELVA vs MVST vs CBAT vs SLDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $483M | $611M | $70M | $635K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $64M | $428M | $162M | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-29M | $-7M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 28.6% | 10.8% | -27.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 1.6% | -10.5% | -5.5% |
| Forward P/E | 72.6x | 31.5x | 6.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $23M | $186M | $30M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $105M | $7M | $47M |
ELVA vs MVST vs CBAT vs SLDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) | 100 | 151.6 | +51.6% |
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT) | 100 | 18.7 | -81.3% |
| Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELVA vs MVST vs CBAT vs SLDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.6%, EPS growth 286.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 59.7%
- 95.6% 10Y total return vs CBAT's -69.9%
- Beta 2.11, current ratio 4.16x
- 42.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6%
MVST plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CBAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.05
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 25.1%, current ratio 0.82x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.05 vs SLDP's 2.93
SLDP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs SLDP's -485.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs SLDP's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +259.6% vs CBAT's -6.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs SLDP's -23.5%, ROIC 10.9% vs -19.6% |
ELVA vs MVST vs CBAT vs SLDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ELVA vs MVST vs CBAT vs SLDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ELVA leads in 3 of 6 categories
CBAT leads 1 • MVST leads 0 • SLDP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST is the larger business by revenue, generating $428M annually — 22.7x SLDP's $19M. ELVA is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLDP's -4.9%. On growth, ELVA holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $428M | $162M | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $32M | -$8M | -$83M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$29M | -$7M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $56M | -$8M | -$75M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +28.6% | +10.8% | -27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +1.6% | -10.5% | -5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -6.8% | -4.0% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +13.1% | -5.1% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.3% | -15.0% | +36.5% | -48.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +119.2% | — | +25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CBAT trades at a 95% valuation discount to ELVA's 119.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 99.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $483M | $611M | $70M | $634,513 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $499M | $692M | $94M | -$38M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 119.85x | -21.00x | 6.04x | -5.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 72.61x | 31.50x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 10.23x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 70.64x | 99.04x | 5.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.60x | 1.43x | 0.40x | 0.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.00x | 1.49x | 0.59x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.89x | 3.13x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELVA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELVA delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-22 for SLDP. SLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ELVA's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs SLDP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | -7.4% | -5.5% | -21.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -2.9% | -2.0% | -23.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +0.9% | +4.6% | -19.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.1% | +1.2% | +7.0% | -23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.45x | 0.25x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | $81M | $23M | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $105M | $7M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $186M | $30M | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | -16.53x | -24.86x | -488.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELVA five years ago would be worth $15,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,559 for MVST. Over the past 12 months, ELVA leads with a +259.6% total return vs CBAT's -6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELVA at 38.9% vs CBAT's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.5% | -33.0% | -8.7% | -37.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +259.6% | -2.1% | -6.9% | +143.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.9% | +58.8% | +2.0% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | -84.4% | -81.0% | -70.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.6% | -80.7% | -69.9% | -70.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.9% | +16.7% | +0.7% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELVA and CBAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLDP's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ELVA currently trades 82.3% from its 52-week high vs MVST's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 2.45x | 1.05x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.88 | $7.12 | $1.25 | $8.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.66 | $1.37 | $0.77 | $1.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +26.5% | +62.8% | +33.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 54.4 | 39.6 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 340K | 3.9M | 111K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ELVA as "Buy", MVST as "Buy", SLDP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 154.0% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs 14.2% for ELVA (target: $11).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.17 | $4.80 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 6 | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +100.0% |
ELVA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CBAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ELVA vs MVST vs CBAT vs SLDP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Electrovaya Inc.
(ELVA) is the stronger pick with 42. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP?
On trailing P/E, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Electrovaya Inc. at 119. 9x. On forward P/E, Microvast Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP?
Over the past 5 years, Electrovaya Inc.
(ELVA) delivered a total return of +59. 0%, compared to -84. 4% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELVA returned +95. 6% versus MVST's -80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Solid Power, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SLDP is approximately 180% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 72% for Electrovaya Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Electrovaya Inc.
(ELVA) is pulling ahead at 42. 6% versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for Solid Power, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELVA leads at 59. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -429. 5% for Solid Power, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELVA leads at 8. 7% versus -463. 7% for SLDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ELVA leads at 30. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) trades at 31. 5x forward P/E versus 72. 6x for Electrovaya Inc. — 41. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 154. 0% to $4. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ELVA or MVST or CBAT or SLDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBAT: -69. 9%, MVST: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELVA and MVST and CBAT and SLDP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ELVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLDP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.