EM
Smart Share Global Limited
Personal Products & Services
Market Cap$153M
5Y Perf.-84.2%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EM vs BEEM vs EVGO vs BLNK vs CHPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BEEM
Beam Global
Solar
Market Cap$35M
5Y Perf.-41.1%
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$618M
5Y Perf.-83.9%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
Engineering & Construction
Market Cap$97M
5Y Perf.-98.0%
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$135M
5Y Perf.-98.7%
EM vs BEEM vs EVGO vs BLNK vs CHPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EM | BEEM | EVGO | BLNK | CHPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Solar | Specialty Retail | Engineering & Construction | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $153M | $35M | $618M | $97M | $135M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.07B | $28M | $418M | $106M | $411M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-250M | $-29M | $-47M | $-126M | $-220M |
| Gross Margin | 62.4% | 15.0% | 20.2% | 26.0% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | -108.4% | -26.3% | -119.5% | -51.1% |
| Forward P/E | 2.3x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $7M | $2M | $107M | $11M | $272M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $787M | $5M | $151M | $42M | $142M |
EM vs BEEM vs EVGO vs BLNK vs CHPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EM
BEEM
EVGO
BLNK
CHPT
| Stock | Apr 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Share Global … (EM) | 100 | 15.8 | -84.2% |
| Beam Global (BEEM) | 100 | 5.5 | -94.5% |
| EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) | 100 | 16.1 | -83.9% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EM vs BEEM vs EVGO vs BLNK vs CHPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EM leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. EVgo, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BEEM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EM
Smart Share Global Limited
The Income Pick
EM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 3.17x
- Beta 0.10, yield 5.3%, current ratio 3.17x
- -8.2% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BEEM
Beam Global
The Long-Run Compounder
BEEM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- -76.9% 10Y total return vs EVGO's -79.9%
- +25.7% vs EVGO's -48.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.
The Growth Play
EVGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 91.6%
- 49.6% revenue growth vs EM's -36.0%
- -5.1% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC -21.9% vs -109.7%
Best for: growth exposure
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Industrials Pick
BLNK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick
Among these 5 stocks, CHPT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EVGO | 49.6% revenue growth vs EM's -36.0% |
| Quality / Margins | EM | -8.2% margin vs BLNK's -118.7% |
| Stability / Safety | EM | Beta 0.10 vs BLNK's 3.11, lower leverage |
| Dividends | EM | 5.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BEEM | +25.7% vs EVGO's -48.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EVGO | -5.1% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC -21.9% vs -109.7% |
EM vs BEEM vs EVGO vs BLNK vs CHPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
EM vs BEEM vs EVGO vs BLNK vs CHPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMLAGGINGCHPT
Who Leads Where
EM leads in 4 of 6 categories
BEEM leads 0 • EVGO leads 0 • BLNK leads 0 • CHPT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓CHPTChargePoint Holdings,…
0leads
BLNKBlink Charging Co.
0leads
EVGOEVgo, Inc.
0leads
BEEMBeam Global
0leads
EMSmart Share Global Li…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BEEMvs EVGOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EM5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EM2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EM5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
EM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 110.9x BEEM's $28M. EM is the more profitable business, keeping -8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%. On growth, EVGO holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | BEEMBeam Global | EVGOEVgo, Inc. | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $28M | $418M | $106M | $411M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$106M | -$25M | -$39M | -$115M | -$180M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$250M | -$29M | -$47M | -$126M | -$220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$7M | -$165M | -$47M | -$67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.4% | +15.0% | +20.2% | +26.0% | +30.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -108.4% | -26.3% | -119.5% | -51.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -105.9% | -11.1% | -118.7% | -53.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -24.0% | -39.5% | -44.5% | -16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | -49.6% | +45.5% | +11.7% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +149.4% | -4.2% | -66.7% | +99.9% | +28.8% |
EM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | BEEMBeam Global | EVGOEVgo, Inc. | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $153M | $35M | $618M | $97M | $135M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $32M | $574M | $66M | $265M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -73.91x | -2.42x | -6.35x | -0.43x | -0.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.28x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.98x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 0.70x | 1.61x | 0.78x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 0.66x | 0.68x | 0.72x | 6.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
EM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EM delivers a -9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. EM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVGO scores 6/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | BEEMBeam Global | EVGOEVgo, Inc. | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.0% | -110.5% | -12.2% | -131.9% | -3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | -65.7% | -5.1% | -66.7% | -25.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | -22.1% | -21.9% | -109.7% | -83.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -21.4% | -14.5% | -77.3% | -41.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.05x | 0.28x | 0.09x | 12.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$781M | -$3M | -$44M | -$31M | $130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $787M | $5M | $151M | $42M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $2M | $107M | $11M | $272M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.98x | -715.85x | -11.79x | -9064.60x | -8.58x |
EM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EM and BEEM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EM five years ago would be worth $1,781 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $146 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, BEEM leads with a +25.7% total return vs EVGO's -48.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EM at 8.8% vs CHPT's -67.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | BEEMBeam Global | EVGOEVgo, Inc. | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | +14.8% | -36.0% | +14.2% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.6% | +25.7% | -48.6% | +1.0% | -48.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | -81.1% | -69.4% | -88.1% | -96.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -92.9% | -82.4% | -97.2% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | -76.9% | -79.9% | -97.3% | -96.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | -42.6% | -32.6% | -50.9% | -67.5% |
Evenly matched — EM and BEEM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EM is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EM currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 31.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | BEEMBeam Global | EVGOEVgo, Inc. | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 2.64x | 2.15x | 3.11x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.46 | $4.04 | $5.18 | $2.65 | $17.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $1.33 | $1.64 | $0.45 | $4.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +46.0% | +38.0% | +31.9% | +35.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.6 | 60.2 | 38.5 | 58.0 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 489K | 4.5M | 2.2M | 479K |
EM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EM as "Hold", EVGO as "Buy", CHPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 166.5% upside for EVGO (target: $5) vs 20.2% for CHPT (target: $8). EM is the only dividend payer here at 5.28% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | BEEMBeam Global | EVGOEVgo, Inc. | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $5.25 | — | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 16 | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
EM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallSmart Share Global Limited (EM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EM vs BEEM vs EVGO vs BLNK vs CHPT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVgo, Inc.
(EVGO) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 0% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM). Analysts rate EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT?
Over the past 5 years, Smart Share Global Limited (EM) delivered a total return of -82.
2%, compared to -98. 5% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEEM returned -76. 9% versus BLNK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 3. 11β — meaning BLNK is approximately 2941% more volatile than EM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Share Global Limited (EM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVgo, Inc.
(EVGO) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -36. 0% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Global grew EPS 40. 8% year-over-year, compared to -116. 2% for Smart Share Global Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT?
Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
7% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps -0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EM leads at -3. 8% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EM leads at 42. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVGO: 166.
5% to $5. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT?
In this comparison, EM (5.
3% yield) pays a dividend. BEEM, EVGO, BLNK, CHPT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is EM or BEEM or EVGO or BLNK or CHPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10), 5. 3% yield). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EM: -85. 7%, BLNK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EM and BEEM and EVGO and BLNK and CHPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (EM (Consumer Cyclical) and BEEM (Energy) and EVGO (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BEEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EM pays a dividend while BEEM, EVGO, BLNK, CHPT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EM: -24.7% · BEEM: -49.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.