Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Agricultural - Machinery
Staffing & Employment Services
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Staffing & Employment Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $131M | $914M | $1.18B | $417M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $1.33B | $1.48B | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $35M | $26M | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 27.2% | 26.1% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 3.8% | 3.7% | -1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 20.8x | 14.3x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $70M | $320M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $2M | $72M | $33M |
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Eastern Company (EML) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EML is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 14.3x)
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 3.1%
- 226.5% 10Y total return vs EML's 61.1%
- Beta 0.27, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.78x
- 2.6% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
ASTE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7%
- +26.1% vs EML's -6.1%
KELYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs KELYA's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs ASTE's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs EML's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.1% vs EML's -6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 5 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 1 • EML leads 0 • ASTE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 17.0x EML's $243M. KFRC is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $1.3B | $1.5B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $56M | $84M | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $35M | $26M | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $43M | $37M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +27.2% | +26.1% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +3.8% | +3.7% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +2.6% | +1.7% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +3.3% | +2.5% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +0.1% | +20.3% | -10.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.6% | +2.2% | -90.3% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.5x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 17% valuation discount to ASTE's 30.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EML's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 17.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $914M | $1.2B | $417M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $981M | $1.4B | $544M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.89x | 25.51x | 30.58x | -1.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | 20.77x | 14.27x | 13.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.88x | 17.64x | 14.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.69x | 0.84x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 7.13x | 1.75x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.79x | 19.53x | 54.94x | 3.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFRC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EML scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +27.2% | +3.8% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +9.2% | +2.0% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +19.1% | +6.2% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +20.1% | +7.2% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.56x | 0.47x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $68M | $248M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $2M | $72M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $70M | $320M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | — | 5.48x | -8.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $9,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,392 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, ASTE leads with a +26.1% total return vs EML's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EML at 10.7% vs KELYA's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +62.1% | +15.7% | +41.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +25.9% | +26.1% | +3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | -11.1% | +18.4% | -28.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | -9.2% | -15.7% | -46.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +226.5% | +3.4% | -24.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | -3.9% | +5.8% | -10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.27x | 1.55x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.77 | $50.70 | $65.65 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $24.49 | $36.43 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +98.6% | +78.2% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 73.3 | 45.2 | 70.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 239K | 197K | 422K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.0% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -29.9% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.09% vs ASTE's 1.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | $36.00 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.1% | +1.0% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $1.55 | $0.51 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +5.6% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
KFRC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 25. 5x versus Astec Industries, Inc. at 30. 6x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -9. 2%, compared to -46. 1% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +226. 5% versus KELYA's -24. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning ASTE is approximately 475% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 56% for Kforce Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTE leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA?
Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASTE leads at 4. 6% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11.
0x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 42. 0% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE).
09Is EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 3. 1% yield, +226. 5% 10Y return). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +226. 5%, ASTE: +3. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EML and KFRC and ASTE and KELYA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EML is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.