Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EML vs NN vs JPM vs BAC vs TRMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
EML vs NN vs JPM vs BAC vs TRMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Internet Content & Information | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $131M | $2.93B | $896.00B | $422.78B | $11.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $4M | $280.33B | $191.57B | $3.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-141M | $57.05B | $30.51B | $456M |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | -208.1% | 60.0% | 56.1% | 68.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | -18.0% | 25.9% | 19.7% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | — | 14.4x | 12.6x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $289M | $942.38B | $365.90B | $1.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $45M | $343.34B | $231.84B | $253M |
EML vs NN vs JPM vs BAC vs TRMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Eastern Company (EML) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 217.2 | +117.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 272.1 | +172.1% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 198.9 | +98.9% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EML vs NN vs JPM vs BAC vs TRMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EML is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 3.59x
- Beta 0.66 vs NN's 1.49
NN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +71.7% vs TRMB's -30.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BAC's 368.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs TRMB's 6.64
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
TRMB is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 5.0% ROA vs NN's -56.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs -43.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 6.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs NN's -35.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs NN's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BAC's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.7% vs TRMB's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs NN's -56.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs -43.9% |
EML vs NN vs JPM vs BAC vs TRMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EML vs NN vs JPM vs BAC vs TRMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories
EML leads 1 • TRMB leads 1 • NN leads 1 • BAC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 69578.8x NN's $4M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -35.1%. On growth, TRMB holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $4M | $280.3B | $191.6B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | -$67M | $81.4B | $40.0B | $843M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$141M | $57.0B | $30.5B | $456M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$49M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $253M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | -2.1% | +60.0% | +56.1% | +68.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | -18.0% | +25.9% | +19.7% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -35.1% | +20.4% | +15.9% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -12.1% | +36.0% | +6.6% | +6.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | -35.3% | — | — | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.6% | +73.3% | +16.0% | +18.3% | +55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EML leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 49% valuation discount to TRMB's 28.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs TRMB's 11.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $2.9B | $896.0B | $422.8B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $3.2B | $1.50T | $556.8B | $13.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.89x | -15.14x | 16.00x | 14.66x | 28.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | — | 14.40x | 12.56x | 16.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | 0.95x | 11.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.88x | — | 18.36x | 13.92x | 16.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 641.46x | 3.20x | 2.21x | 3.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | — | 2.47x | 1.39x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.79x | — | 8.88x | 33.52x | 89.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for EML. TRMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs NN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | — | +15.9% | +10.1% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -56.3% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | -43.9% | +4.5% | +3.5% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | -36.5% | +8.9% | +4.5% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | — | 2.60x | 1.21x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $244M | $599.0B | $134.1B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $45M | $343.3B | $231.8B | $253M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $289M | $942.4B | $365.9B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | -8.46x | 0.74x | 0.48x | 8.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,399 for TRMB. Over the past 12 months, NN leads with a +71.7% total return vs TRMB's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 96.1% vs TRMB's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +32.6% | -0.5% | +1.1% | -35.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +71.7% | +21.8% | +28.1% | -30.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +654.4% | +138.2% | +103.0% | -1.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | +113.9% | +118.2% | +47.1% | -36.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +120.5% | +465.8% | +368.2% | +94.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +96.1% | +33.6% | +26.6% | -0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EML and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EML is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NN's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs TRMB's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.49x | 0.94x | 0.86x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.77 | $24.42 | $337.25 | $57.55 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $10.87 | $262.71 | $43.66 | $48.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +88.0% | +95.1% | +97.3% | +57.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 57.1 | 59.1 | 68.3 | 24.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 2.8M | 7.0M | 31.7M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for TRMB (target: $93) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.67 | $339.75 | $61.13 | $93.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 61 | 54 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — | +1.9% | +2.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 | 12 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | — | $5.95 | $1.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +5.1% | +7.2% |
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). EML leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EML vs NN vs JPM vs BAC vs TRMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus Trimble Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Trimble Inc. 's 6. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -36. 0% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus EML's +61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Eastern Company (EML) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus NextNav Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning NN is approximately 127% more volatile than EML relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Eastern Company grew EPS 161. 3% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Trimble Inc. 's 6. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Trimble Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 85. 1% to $93. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB?
In this comparison, BAC (2.
3% yield), EML (2. 0% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NN, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EML or NN or JPM or BAC or TRMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 2. 3% yield, +368. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAC: +368. 2%, NN: +120. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EML and NN and JPM and BAC and TRMB?
These companies operate in different sectors (EML (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and TRMB (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EML is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EML, JPM, BAC pay a dividend while NN, TRMB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.