Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EML vs NN vs TRMB vs ASTE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Agricultural - Machinery
EML vs NN vs TRMB vs ASTE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Internet Content & Information | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $131M | $2.93B | $11.94B | $1.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $4M | $3.69B | $1.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-141M | $456M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | -208.1% | 68.1% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | -18.0% | 17.8% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | — | 16.3x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $289M | $1.39B | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $45M | $253M | $72M |
EML vs NN vs TRMB vs ASTE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Eastern Company (EML) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 217.2 | +117.2% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 88.6 | -11.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EML vs NN vs TRMB vs ASTE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EML carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 3.59x
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 14.3x)
NN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 120.5% 10Y total return vs TRMB's 94.4%
- +71.7% vs TRMB's -30.3%
TRMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 12.4% margin vs NN's -35.1%
- 5.0% ROA vs NN's -56.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs -43.9%
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs NN's -35.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs ASTE's 1.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs ASTE's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.7% vs TRMB's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs NN's -56.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs -43.9% |
EML vs NN vs TRMB vs ASTE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EML vs NN vs TRMB vs ASTE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
EML leads 2 • NN leads 1 • ASTE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 915.0x NN's $4M. TRMB is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -35.1%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $4M | $3.7B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | -$67M | $843M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$141M | $456M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$49M | $253M | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | -2.1% | +68.1% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | -18.0% | +17.8% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -35.1% | +12.4% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -12.1% | +6.9% | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | -35.3% | +11.8% | +20.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.6% | +73.3% | +55.6% | -90.3% |
Valuation Metrics
EML leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.9x trailing earnings, EML trades at a 15% valuation discount to ASTE's 30.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EML's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRMB's 16.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $2.9B | $11.9B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $3.2B | $13.1B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.89x | -15.14x | 28.81x | 30.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | — | 16.31x | 14.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 11.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.88x | — | 16.62x | 14.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 641.46x | 3.33x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | — | 2.07x | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.79x | — | 89.67x | 54.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMB delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for EML. TRMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASTE's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EML scores 6/9 vs NN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | — | +8.0% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -56.3% | +5.0% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | -43.9% | +6.8% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | -36.5% | +7.8% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | — | 0.24x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $244M | $1.1B | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $45M | $253M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $289M | $1.4B | $320M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | -8.46x | 8.03x | 5.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NN five years ago would be worth $21,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,399 for TRMB. Over the past 12 months, NN leads with a +71.7% total return vs TRMB's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 96.1% vs TRMB's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +32.6% | -35.6% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +71.7% | -30.3% | +26.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +654.4% | -1.2% | +18.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | +113.9% | -36.0% | -15.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +120.5% | +94.4% | +3.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +96.1% | -0.4% | +5.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EML and NN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EML is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NN currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs TRMB's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.49x | 1.38x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.77 | $24.42 | $87.50 | $65.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $10.87 | $48.90 | $36.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +88.0% | +57.6% | +78.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 57.1 | 24.8 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 2.8M | 2.2M | 197K |
Analyst Outlook
EML leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NN as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy", ASTE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for TRMB (target: $93) vs -29.9% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, EML offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs ASTE's 1.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.67 | $93.33 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 28 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | — | — | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | 0.0% | +7.2% | 0.0% |
TRMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EML leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
EML vs NN vs TRMB vs ASTE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). The Eastern Company (EML) offers the better valuation at 25. 9x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE?
On trailing P/E, The Eastern Company (EML) is the cheapest at 25.
9x versus Astec Industries, Inc. at 30. 6x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE?
Over the past 5 years, NextNav Inc.
(NN) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -36. 0% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NN returned +120. 5% versus ASTE's +3. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Eastern Company (EML) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning ASTE is approximately 136% more volatile than EML relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 47% for Astec Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE?
Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMB leads at 16. 9% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11.
0x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Trimble Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 85. 1% to $93. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE?
In this comparison, EML (2.
0% yield), ASTE (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NN, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EML or NN or TRMB or ASTE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Eastern Company (EML) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EML: +61. 1%, NN: +120. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EML and NN and TRMB and ASTE?
These companies operate in different sectors (EML (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and TRMB (Technology) and ASTE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
EML, ASTE pay a dividend while NN, TRMB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.