Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EML vs NVRI vs NUE vs STLD vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Steel
Steel
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
EML vs NVRI vs NUE vs STLD vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Waste Management | Steel | Steel | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $131M | $1.77B | $60.67B | $40.97B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $2.24B | $34.16B | $19.01B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-168M | $2.33B | $1.37B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 17.8% | 14.0% | 14.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | -0.3% | 10.0% | 9.4% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | — | 17.8x | 18.1x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $1.81B | $7.12B | $4.21B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $104M | $2.26B | $770M | $10.27B |
EML vs NVRI vs NUE vs STLD vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Eastern Company (EML) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Enviri Corporation (NVRI) | 100 | 158.0 | +58.0% |
| Nucor Corporation (NUE) | 100 | 643.2 | +543.2% |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) | 100 | 1083.8 | +983.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EML vs NVRI vs NUE vs STLD vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EML is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 3.59x
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 25.3x)
NVRI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +327.6% vs EML's -6.1%
NUE is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.68 vs KO's 2.26
- 5.7% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7%
STLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.5% 10Y total return vs NUE's 469.2%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 27.8% margin vs NVRI's -7.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs STLD's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs NVRI's -6.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs NVRI's -7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs STLD's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs STLD's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +327.6% vs EML's -6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs NVRI's -6.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.3% |
EML vs NVRI vs NUE vs STLD vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EML vs NVRI vs NUE vs STLD vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
EML leads 1 • NVRI leads 1 • NUE leads 0 • STLD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 203.1x EML's $243M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVRI's -7.5%. On growth, NUE holds the edge at +21.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $2.2B | $34.2B | $19.0B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $178M | $4.9B | $2.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$168M | $2.3B | $1.4B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$37M | $532M | $665M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +17.8% | +14.0% | +14.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | -0.3% | +10.0% | +9.4% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -7.5% | +6.8% | +7.2% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -1.7% | +1.6% | +3.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +0.2% | +21.3% | +19.1% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.6% | +23.5% | +3.8% | +93.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
EML leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.9x trailing earnings, EML trades at a 27% valuation discount to NUE's 35.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NUE offers better value at 1.36x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $1.8B | $60.7B | $41.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $3.5B | $65.5B | $44.4B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.89x | -10.26x | 35.42x | 35.39x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | — | 17.80x | 18.10x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.36x | 1.40x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.88x | 12.81x | 15.83x | 21.90x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.79x | 1.87x | 2.25x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 5.83x | 2.78x | 4.70x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.79x | — | — | 81.69x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-48 for NVRI. NUE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVRI's 6.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUE scores 7/9 vs NVRI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | -48.3% | +10.6% | +15.3% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -6.1% | +6.7% | +8.5% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +3.3% | +7.7% | +9.2% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +4.2% | +8.9% | +10.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 6.11x | 0.32x | 0.47x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $1.7B | $4.9B | $3.4B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $104M | $2.3B | $770M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $1.8B | $7.1B | $4.2B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | -0.09x | 29.72x | 20.39x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $46,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,258 for EML. Over the past 12 months, NVRI leads with a +327.6% total return vs EML's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVRI at 60.5% vs EML's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +103.1% | +57.6% | +60.9% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +327.6% | +126.7% | +116.0% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +313.1% | +83.8% | +185.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | +61.2% | +169.4% | +360.9% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +460.1% | +469.2% | +1051.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +60.5% | +22.5% | +41.8% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NUE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STLD's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUE currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs EML's 81.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.12x | 1.02x | 1.30x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.77 | $21.74 | $268.80 | $285.88 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $7.70 | $115.66 | $119.89 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +98.2% | +99.1% | +98.9% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 58.2 | 69.9 | 74.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 1.3M | 1.3M | 1.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVRI as "Hold", NUE as "Buy", STLD as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -16.6% for STLD (target: $236). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs STLD's 0.69%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.25 | $240.86 | $235.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 32 | 27 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — | +0.8% | +0.7% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 16 | 13 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | — | $2.22 | $1.96 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +2.2% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EML leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EML vs NVRI vs NUE vs STLD vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger pick with 5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). The Eastern Company (EML) offers the better valuation at 25. 9x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nucor Corporation (NUE) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO?
On trailing P/E, The Eastern Company (EML) is the cheapest at 25.
9x versus Nucor Corporation at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nucor Corporation wins at 0. 68x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) delivered a total return of +360. 9%, compared to -27. 4% for The Eastern Company (EML). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +1052% versus EML's +61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Steel Dynamics, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning STLD is approximately -748% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nucor Corporation (NUE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 6% for Enviri Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is pulling ahead at 5.
7% versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Eastern Company grew EPS 161. 3% year-over-year, compared to -30. 0% for Enviri Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -7. 5% for Enviri Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 9% for NVRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), EML (2. 0% yield), NUE (0. 8% yield), STLD (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NVRI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EML or NVRI or NUE or STLD or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NVRI: +460. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EML and NVRI and NUE and STLD and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (EML (Industrials) and NVRI (Industrials) and NUE (Basic Materials) and STLD (Basic Materials) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
EML, NUE, STLD, KO pay a dividend while NVRI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.