EMP
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66
Regulated Electric
Market Cap$9.76B
5Y Perf.-20.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EMP vs ENO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ENO
Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066
Regulated Electric
Market Cap$10.22B
5Y Perf.-17.0%
EMP vs ENO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EMP | ENO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $9.76B | $10.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.29B | $13.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.78B | $1.78B |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 23.1% |
| Forward P/E | 5.4x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $3.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $156M | — |
EMP vs ENO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EMP
ENO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entergy Mississippi… (EMP) | 100 | 79.3 | -20.7% |
| Entergy New Orleans… (ENO) | 100 | 83.0 | -17.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EMP vs ENO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EMP leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066 is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EMP
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66
The Income Pick
EMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 59.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 99.8%
- PEG 0.13 vs ENO's 0.17
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ENO
Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066
The Long-Run Compounder
ENO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 37.4% 10Y total return vs EMP's 30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 17.9%
- Beta 0.75
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EMP | 9.0% revenue growth vs ENO's 9.0% |
| Value | EMP | Lower P/E (5.4x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.13 vs 0.17 |
| Quality / Margins | EMP | 13.4% margin vs ENO's 13.4% |
| Stability / Safety | ENO | Beta 0.75 vs EMP's 0.76 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EMP | +7.7% vs ENO's +6.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ENO | 14.5% ROA vs EMP's 0.1%, ROIC 22.5% vs 12.9% |
EMP vs ENO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
EMP vs ENO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMPLAGGINGENO
ENOEntergy New Orleans, …
2leads
EMPEntergy Mississippi, …
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ENOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EMP1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EMP5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ENO3/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ENO4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMP and ENO operate at a comparable scale, with $13.3B and $13.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.4% (EMP) to 13.4% (ENO).
| Metric | EMPEntergy Mississip… | ENOEntergy New Orlea… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $13.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.2B | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.9B | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.5% | +67.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +23.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +12.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +1.2% |
EMP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
EMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, EMP trades at a 4% valuation discount to ENO's 5.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ENO offers better value at 0.08x vs EMP's 0.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | EMPEntergy Mississip… | ENOEntergy New Orlea… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.8B | $10.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.6B | $13.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.40x | 5.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.13x | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.39x | 2.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.54x | 16.27x |
EMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENO delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $11 for EMP. EMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENO's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMP scores 4/9 vs ENO's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | EMPEntergy Mississip… | ENOEntergy New Orlea… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +14.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.9% | +22.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.1% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $156M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.61x | 2.61x |
ENO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENO five years ago would be worth $11,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,491 for EMP. Over the past 12 months, EMP leads with a +7.7% total return vs ENO's +6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENO at 3.0% vs EMP's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EMPEntergy Mississip… | ENOEntergy New Orlea… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | -0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.7% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +9.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.9% | +14.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.8% | +37.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +3.0% |
ENO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EMP and ENO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENO is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EMP's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EMP currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs ENO's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EMPEntergy Mississip… | ENOEntergy New Orlea… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.50 | $24.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.90 | $6.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 6K |
Evenly matched — EMP and ENO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | EMPEntergy Mississip… | ENOEntergy New Orlea… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
EMP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ENO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallEntergy Mississippi, Inc. 1… (EMP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EMP vs ENO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EMP or ENO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
1M BD 66 (EMP) is the stronger pick with 9. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO). Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EMP or ENO?
On trailing P/E, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
1M BD 66 (EMP) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 at 5. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EMP or ENO?
Over the past 5 years, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.
50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) delivered a total return of +14. 4%, compared to +4. 9% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENO returned +37. 4% versus EMP's +30. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EMP or ENO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.
50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66's 0. 76β — meaning EMP is approximately 1% more volatile than ENO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 18% for Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EMP or ENO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
1M BD 66 (EMP) is pulling ahead at 9. 0% versus 9. 0% for Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 grew EPS 59. 6% year-over-year, compared to 59. 6% for Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENO leads at 135. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EMP or ENO?
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
1M BD 66 (EMP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus 13. 6% for Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMP leads at 24. 7% versus 24. 7% for ENO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMP leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — EMP or ENO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is EMP or ENO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.
50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENO: +37. 4%, EMP: +30. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EMP and ENO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EMP: 12.0% · ENO: 12.0%)Net Margin>
%
(EMP: 13.4% · ENO: 13.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(EMP: 5.4x · ENO: 5.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.