ENLT vs BEP

For growth investors, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) is the stronger pick with 320.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 9% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) offers the better valuation at 80. 1x trailing P/E (203. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) delivered a total return of +46.

8%, compared to +13. 8% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENLT returned +46. 8% versus BEP's +198. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Renewable Partners L.

P. (BEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd's 1. 55β — meaning ENLT is approximately 82% more volatile than BEP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 3% for Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) is pulling ahead at 320.

6% versus 10. 9% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd grew EPS 163. 1% year-over-year, compared to 92. 4% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENLT leads at 105. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

0% net margin versus -0. 3% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENLT leads at 46. 6% versus 13. 4% for BEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENLT leads at 41. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BEP: 2.

0% to $35. 17.

In this comparison, BEP (11.

7% yield) pays a dividend. ENLT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.

P. (BEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 11. 7% yield, +198. 4% 10Y return). Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEP: +198. 4%, ENLT: +46. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ENLT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. BEP pays a dividend while ENLT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.