Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ENO vs EMP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ENO
Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.18B
5Y Perf.-17.2%
EMP
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.74B
5Y Perf.-20.9%

ENO vs EMP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ENO logoENO
EMP logoEMP
IndustryRegulated ElectricRegulated Electric
Market Cap$10.18B$9.74B
Revenue (TTM)$13.29B$13.29B
Net Income (TTM)$1.78B$1.78B
Gross Margin67.5%67.5%
Operating Margin23.1%23.1%
Forward P/E12.6x5.4x
Total Debt$3.03B$3.03B
Cash & Equiv.$156M

ENO vs EMPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ENO
EMP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Entergy New Orleans… (ENO)10082.8-17.2%
Entergy Mississippi… (EMP)10079.1-20.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ENO vs EMP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ENO and EMP are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ENO
Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066
The Income Pick

ENO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.75
  • Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 59.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 135.0%
  • 37.1% 10Y total return vs EMP's 30.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
EMP
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66
The Defensive Pick

EMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 756.51x
  • PEG 0.13 vs ENO's 0.17
  • Beta 0.75, current ratio 756.51x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthENO logoENO9.0% revenue growth vs EMP's 9.0%
ValueEMP logoEMPLower P/E (5.4x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.13 vs 0.17
Quality / MarginsENO logoENO13.4% margin vs EMP's 13.4%
Stability / SafetyEMP logoEMPBeta 0.75 vs ENO's 0.75
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EMP logoEMP+7.3% vs ENO's +6.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ENO logoENO14.5% ROA vs EMP's 0.1%, ROIC 22.5% vs 12.9%

ENO vs EMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ENOEntergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.50% Series due April 1, 2066
FY 2025
Electricity, US Regulated
98.7%$12.8B
Natural Gas, US Regulated
0.9%$113M
Product and Service, Other
0.5%$59M
EMPEntergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66
FY 2025
Electricity, US Regulated
98.7%$12.8B
Natural Gas, US Regulated
0.9%$113M
Product and Service, Other
0.5%$59M

ENO vs EMP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEMPLAGGINGENO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EMP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

ENO and EMP operate at a comparable scale, with $13.3B and $13.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.4% (ENO) to 13.4% (EMP).

MetricENO logoENOEntergy New Orlea…EMP logoEMPEntergy Mississip…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13.3B$13.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.2B$5.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.8B$1.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1.1B$3.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.5%+67.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.1%+23.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.4%+13.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.0%+29.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.0%+12.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.2%+1.2%
EMP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

EMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.4x trailing earnings, EMP trades at a 4% valuation discount to ENO's 5.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ENO offers better value at 0.08x vs EMP's 0.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricENO logoENOEntergy New Orlea…EMP logoEMPEntergy Mississip…
Market CapShares × price$10.2B$9.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.2B$12.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.63x5.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.08x0.13x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.50x2.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.79x0.75x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.59x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.22x15.51x
EMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ENO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

ENO delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $11 for EMP. ENO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EMP's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMP scores 4/9 vs ENO's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricENO logoENOEntergy New Orlea…EMP logoEMPEntergy Mississip…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.9%+11.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.5%+0.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.5%+12.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.0B$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$156M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.0B$3.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.61x2.61x
ENO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ENO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ENO five years ago would be worth $11,403 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,452 for EMP. Over the past 12 months, EMP leads with a +7.3% total return vs ENO's +6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENO at 2.9% vs EMP's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricENO logoENOEntergy New Orlea…EMP logoEMPEntergy Mississip…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.5%+4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+6.3%+7.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.0%+6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.0%+4.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+37.1%+30.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.9%+2.1%
ENO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EMP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENO's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EMP currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ENO's 88.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricENO logoENOEntergy New Orlea…EMP logoEMPEntergy Mississip…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.75x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.95$22.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.00$5.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.3%+93.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.666.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6K21K
EMP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricENO logoENOEntergy New Orlea…EMP logoEMPEntergy Mississip…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

EMP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ENO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).

Best OverallEntergy Mississippi, Inc. 1… (EMP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ENO vs EMP: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ENO or EMP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.

50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the stronger pick with 9. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP). Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ENO or EMP?

On trailing P/E, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.

1M BD 66 (EMP) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 at 5. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ENO or EMP?

Over the past 5 years, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.

50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) delivered a total return of +14. 0%, compared to +4. 5% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENO returned +37. 1% versus EMP's +30. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ENO or EMP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Entergy Mississippi, Inc.

1M BD 66 (EMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066's 0. 75β — meaning ENO is approximately 1% more volatile than EMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 18% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ENO or EMP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.

50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is pulling ahead at 9. 0% versus 9. 0% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 grew EPS 59. 6% year-over-year, compared to 59. 6% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENO leads at 135. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ENO or EMP?

Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.

50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus 13. 6% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENO leads at 24. 7% versus 24. 7% for EMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ENO or EMP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is ENO or EMP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.

1M BD 66 (EMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EMP: +30. 6%, ENO: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ENO and EMP?

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ENO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EMP

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ENO and EMP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ENO: 12.0% · EMP: 12.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(ENO: 13.4% · EMP: 13.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ENO: 5.6x · EMP: 5.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.