Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ENOV vs LMAT vs ATRC vs NVCR vs IRTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
ENOV vs LMAT vs ATRC vs NVCR vs IRTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $2.46B | $1.33B | $2.04B | $3.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.28B | $256M | $552M | $674M | $788M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.14B | $62M | $-5M | $-173M | $-28M |
| Gross Margin | 60.5% | 72.4% | 75.5% | 75.2% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | -49.5% | 28.5% | -0.4% | -27.2% | -3.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 36.1x | 428.7x | — | 27422.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.38B | $186M | $88M | $290M | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $28M | $167M | $103M | $236M |
ENOV vs LMAT vs ATRC vs NVCR vs IRTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enovis Corporation (ENOV) | 100 | 54.9 | -45.1% |
| LeMaitre Vascular, … (LMAT) | 100 | 401.4 | +301.4% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| iRhythm Technologie… (IRTC) | 100 | 97.1 | -2.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENOV vs LMAT vs ATRC vs NVCR vs IRTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENOV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 27422.7x)
LMAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 0.7%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs IRTC's 363.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 47.2%, current ratio 12.89x
- Beta 0.71, yield 0.7%, current ratio 12.89x
ATRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IRTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 61.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.1%
- 26.2% revenue growth vs ENOV's 6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% revenue growth vs ENOV's 6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 27422.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs ENOV's -49.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.5% vs ENOV's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs ENOV's -26.6%, ROIC 9.7% vs -26.2% |
ENOV vs LMAT vs ATRC vs NVCR vs IRTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ENOV vs LMAT vs ATRC vs NVCR vs IRTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LMAT leads in 5 of 6 categories
ENOV leads 1 • ATRC leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • IRTC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LMAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENOV is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 8.9x LMAT's $256M. LMAT is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENOV's -49.9%. On growth, IRTC holds the edge at +25.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $256M | $552M | $674M | $788M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$911M | $81M | $13M | -$165M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.1B | $62M | -$5M | -$173M | -$28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $79M | $54M | -$48M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.5% | +72.4% | +75.5% | +75.2% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -49.5% | +28.5% | -0.4% | -27.2% | -3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -49.9% | +24.3% | -0.8% | -25.7% | -3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +30.9% | +9.7% | -7.1% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +11.2% | +14.3% | +12.3% | +25.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.8% | +41.7% | +101.6% | -100.0% | +55.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ENOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LMAT's 33.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 73.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $2.5B | $1.3B | $2.0B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $2.6B | $1.3B | $2.2B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.27x | 42.83x | -109.50x | -14.66x | -86.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.29x | 36.14x | 428.71x | — | 27422.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.21x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.40x | 73.24x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 9.85x | 2.49x | 3.11x | 5.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 6.29x | 2.55x | 5.86x | 25.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 76.30x | 33.02x | 27.56x | — | 114.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LMAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LMAT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-60 for ENOV. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRTC's 4.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LMAT scores 7/9 vs ENOV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.0% | +16.2% | -1.0% | -50.8% | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.6% | +10.3% | -0.7% | -16.5% | -2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.2% | +9.7% | -0.6% | -16.4% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.8% | +12.3% | -0.6% | -28.9% | -4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.47x | 0.18x | 0.85x | 4.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $157M | -$79M | $187M | $495M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $28M | $167M | $103M | $236M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $186M | $88M | $290M | $731M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.74x | 24.99x | 0.47x | -96.80x | -1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LMAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LMAT five years ago would be worth $22,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, LMAT leads with a +33.5% total return vs ENOV's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMAT at 18.2% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.0% | +35.0% | -33.1% | +36.4% | -31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.8% | +33.5% | -15.7% | +2.6% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.4% | +65.2% | -45.0% | -74.2% | -5.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | +128.3% | -64.2% | -90.2% | +54.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | +608.8% | +84.4% | +38.5% | +363.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.5% | +18.2% | -18.1% | -36.4% | -1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LMAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LMAT currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs IRTC's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.71x | 0.95x | 2.15x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.85 | $118.12 | $43.18 | $20.06 | $212.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.00 | $78.35 | $26.10 | $9.82 | $112.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.1% | +91.4% | +60.9% | +89.2% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 43.7 | 44.0 | 70.9 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 865K | 224K | 678K | 1.4M | 525K |
Analyst Outlook
LMAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENOV as "Buy", LMAT as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", IRTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.3% upside for ATRC (target: $51) vs 8.1% for LMAT (target: $117). LMAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.80 | $116.67 | $51.33 | $33.50 | $193.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 20 | 19 | 15 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.79 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LMAT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ENOV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ENOV vs LMAT vs ATRC vs NVCR vs IRTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
(IRTC) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Enovis Corporation (ENOV). LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) offers the better valuation at 42. 8x trailing P/E (36. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enovis Corporation (ENOV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC?
On forward P/E, Enovis Corporation is actually cheaper at 7.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC?
Over the past 5 years, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) delivered a total return of +128. 3%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMAT returned +608. 8% versus ENOV's -39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 203% more volatile than LMAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 5% for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
(IRTC) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus 6. 7% for Enovis Corporation (ENOV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -39. 7% for Enovis Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRTC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC?
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus -52. 7% for Enovis Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMAT leads at 27. 2% versus -52. 6% for ENOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Enovis Corporation (ENOV) trades at 7.
3x forward P/E versus 27422. 7x for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. — 27415. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATRC: 95. 3% to $51. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC?
In this comparison, LMAT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. ENOV, ATRC, NVCR, IRTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENOV or LMAT or ATRC or NVCR or IRTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 0. 7% yield, +608. 8% 10Y return). Enovis Corporation (ENOV) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMAT: +608. 8%, ENOV: -39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENOV and LMAT and ATRC and NVCR and IRTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (ENOV (Industrials) and LMAT (Healthcare) and ATRC (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and IRTC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ENOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRTC is a small-cap high-growth stock. LMAT pays a dividend while ENOV, ATRC, NVCR, IRTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.