Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EOG vs CTRA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
EOG vs CTRA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $75.44B | $27.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.48B | $7.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.50B | $1.72B |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | 36.2% |
| Operating Margin | 36.9% | 29.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $8.41B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.40B | $119M |
EOG vs CTRA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) | 100 | 276.3 | +176.3% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 179.6 | +79.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EOG vs CTRA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.07, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth -3.5%, EPS growth -19.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- 113.7% 10Y total return vs CTRA's 80.2%
CTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is stability and momentum.
- Lower D/E ratio (27.0% vs 28.2%)
- +44.5% vs EOG's +33.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.5% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.4% margin vs CTRA's 23.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (27.0% vs 28.2%) | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CTRA's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs EOG's +33.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs CTRA's 7.1%, ROIC 19.1% vs 10.9% |
EOG vs CTRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EOG vs CTRA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.5B annually — 3.2x CTRA's $7.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 23.4% (EOG) to 23.3% (CTRA). On growth, CTRA holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.5B | $7.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13.6B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.5B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.2B | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.5% | +36.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +29.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +23.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | +23.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.6% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, EOG trades at a 2% valuation discount to CTRA's 15.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EOG's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CTRA's 6.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $75.4B | $27.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.5B | $30.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.46x | 15.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.81x | 12.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.35x | 6.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.34x | 9.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.55x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.20x | 16.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTRA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EOG delivers a 18.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $12 for CTRA. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EOG's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTRA scores 6/9 vs EOG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.3% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.1% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.0B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.4B | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.66x | 12.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTRA five years ago would be worth $24,184 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,991 for EOG. Over the past 12 months, CTRA leads with a +44.5% total return vs EOG's +33.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRA at 15.0% vs EOG's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.2% | +34.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.5% | +44.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.5% | +52.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.9% | +141.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.7% | +80.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | +15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EOG and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EOG is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTRA's 0.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRA currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs EOG's 92.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.07x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.87 | $36.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $101.59 | $22.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.8 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.8M | 8.8M |
Analyst Outlook
EOG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EOG as "Buy" and CTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -2.1% upside for EOG (target: $138) vs -4.6% for CTRA (target: $34). For income investors, EOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.85% vs CTRA's 2.52%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $137.93 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 66 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.01 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +0.5% |
EOG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CTRA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
EOG vs CTRA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EOG or CTRA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EOG Resources, Inc.
(EOG) is the stronger pick with -3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) a "Buy" — based on 66 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EOG or CTRA?
On trailing P/E, EOG Resources, Inc.
(EOG) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Coterra Energy Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, EOG Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EOG or CTRA?
Over the past 5 years, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) delivered a total return of +141. 8%, compared to +119. 9% for EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EOG returned +113. 7% versus CTRA's +80. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EOG or CTRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EOG Resources, Inc.
(EOG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus Coterra Energy Inc. 's 0. 03β — meaning CTRA is approximately -140% more volatile than EOG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 28% for EOG Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EOG or CTRA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EOG Resources, Inc.
(EOG) is pulling ahead at -3. 5% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coterra Energy Inc. grew EPS 49. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for EOG Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EOG leads at -8. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EOG or CTRA?
Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 22. 1% for EOG Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 35. 1% for EOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EOG leads at 68. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EOG or CTRA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EOG Resources, Inc.
(EOG) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Coterra Energy Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EOG: -2. 1% to $137. 93.
08Which pays a better dividend — EOG or CTRA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 5% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
09Is EOG or CTRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EOG Resources, Inc.
(EOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07), 2. 8% yield, +113. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EOG: +113. 7%, CTRA: +80. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EOG and CTRA?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.