Oil & Gas Energy
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EONR vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Regulated Water
EONR vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $36M | $447M | $2.08B | $2.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $562M | $1.18B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-51M | $-12M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 79.7% | 10.7% | 8.3% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -31.7% | 1.3% | -1.1% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 2176.9x | 38.9x |
| Total Debt | $43M | $383M | $249M | $374M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $20M | $91M | $18M |
EONR vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EON Resources Inc. (EONR) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 389.4 | +289.4% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 239.7 | +139.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EONR vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EONR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 15.4% margin vs NINE's -9.1%
- 2.7% ROA vs NINE's -14.5%, ROIC -4.1% vs 2.3%
NINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.4%, EPS growth -12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.8%
- 1.4% revenue growth vs EONR's -24.4%
- +13.9% vs EONR's +72.8%
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 1.02 vs NINE's 3.04
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 1.7%
- 39.3% 10Y total return vs NINE's -60.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.4% revenue growth vs EONR's -24.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.4% margin vs NINE's -9.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs NINE's 3.04 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.9% vs EONR's +72.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs NINE's -14.5%, ROIC -4.1% vs 2.3% |
EONR vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EONR vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EONR leads in 2 of 6 categories
NINE leads 1 • WTTR leads 1 • PUMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EONR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 80.8x EONR's $17M. EONR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NINE's -9.1%. On growth, WTTR holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $562M | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $57M | $154M | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$51M | -$12M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$23M | -$11M | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.7% | +10.7% | +8.3% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.7% | +1.3% | -1.1% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | -9.1% | -1.1% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -153.4% | -4.1% | -0.9% | -6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -6.5% | -24.7% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.9% | -100.0% | -134.2% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NINE and PUMP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 93.0x trailing earnings, WTTR trades at a 96% valuation discount to PUMP's 2176.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PUMP's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 14.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $447M | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $76M | $810M | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | -8.26x | 2176.92x | 93.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 38.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.07x | 11.58x | 11.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 0.80x | 1.64x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.14x | — | 2.16x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 287.37x | — | 49.01x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EONR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EONR delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EONR's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | — | -1.4% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | -14.5% | -1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.1% | +2.3% | +1.4% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.2% | +2.9% | +1.8% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | — | 0.30x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $363M | $158M | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $20M | $91M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43M | $383M | $249M | $374M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 0.14x | -0.86x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $57,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $655 for EONR. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1392.6% total return vs EONR's +72.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 49.8% vs EONR's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +69.3% | +2815.3% | +72.9% | +69.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.8% | +1392.6% | +180.7% | +118.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +236.2% | +152.7% | +159.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +473.3% | +60.6% | +205.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -60.5% | +17.1% | +39.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.4% | +49.8% | +36.2% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EONR and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EONR is the less volatile stock with a -2.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs EONR's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -2.59x | 3.04x | 1.02x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.58 | $10.68 | $18.50 | $18.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $0.00 | $4.51 | $7.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.6% | +96.6% | +91.8% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 85.2 | 56.7 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.3M | 35K | 3.6M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
WTTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -13.1% for PUMP (target: $15). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $14.75 | $19.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 30 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
EONR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NINE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
EONR vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) is the stronger pick with 1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 4% for EON Resources Inc. (EONR). Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) offers the better valuation at 93. 0x trailing P/E (38. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?
On trailing P/E, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the cheapest at 93. 0x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2176. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +473. 3%, compared to -93. 5% for EON Resources Inc. (EONR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +39. 3% versus EONR's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EON Resources Inc.
(EONR) is the lower-risk stock at -2. 59β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 04β — meaning NINE is approximately -218% more volatile than EONR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 156% for EON Resources Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) is pulling ahead at 1. 4% versus -24. 4% for EON Resources Inc. (EONR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -105. 2% for EON Resources Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WTTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -44. 8% for EON Resources Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTTR leads at 2. 5% versus -19. 0% for EONR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EONR leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 74.
4% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. EONR, NINE, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EONR or NINE or PUMP or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EON Resources Inc.
(EONR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -2. 59)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EONR: -93. 5%, NINE: -60. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EONR and NINE and PUMP and WTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (EONR (Energy) and NINE (Energy) and PUMP (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR pays a dividend while EONR, NINE, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.