Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EP vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR vs SLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Regulated Water
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
EP vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR vs SLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $96M | $58M | $427M | $1.89B | $79.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $34M | $637M | $571M | $1.40B | $35.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-72M | $-77M | $-41M | $22M | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 91.7% | 21.2% | 11.5% | 18.2% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -208.5% | 10.2% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 41.7x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $318M | $383M | $374M | $12.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $6M | $18M | $18M | $3.04B |
EP vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR vs SLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empire Petroleum Co… (EP) | 100 | 580.4 | +480.4% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 468.5 | +368.5% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 281.6 | +181.6% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 288.4 | +188.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EP vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR vs SLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KLXE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
NINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +15.1% vs EP's -30.6%
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs EP's 7.1%
SLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.87, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.6% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs EP's -210.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WTTR's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs EP's -30.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs EP's -65.9%, ROIC 12.1% vs -36.7% |
EP vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR vs SLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EP vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR vs SLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SLB leads in 3 of 6 categories
KLXE leads 1 • NINE leads 1 • EP leads 0 • WTTR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 1044.0x EP's $34M. SLB is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EP's -2.1%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $34M | $637M | $571M | $1.4B | $35.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | $160M | $61M | $217M | $7.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$72M | -$77M | -$41M | $22M | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$42M | -$7M | -$95M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.7% | +21.2% | +11.5% | +18.2% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +10.2% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -12.1% | -7.2% | +1.5% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -6.5% | -1.2% | -6.8% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.0% | -5.3% | -4.4% | -2.3% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.3% | +13.3% | -34.6% | -4.4% | -31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KLXE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 73% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96M | $58M | $427M | $1.9B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $110M | $371M | $791M | $2.2B | $88.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.29x | -0.79x | -7.88x | 84.10x | 22.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 41.66x | 19.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.71x | 337.01x | 10.70x | 12.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.79x | 0.09x | — | 1.34x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 1.88x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-177 for EP. WTTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLB's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLB scores 4/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -177.3% | — | — | +2.2% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -65.9% | -21.3% | -11.5% | +1.3% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.7% | -9.4% | +0.7% | +2.3% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.8% | -11.4% | +0.9% | +2.9% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 0.40x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $313M | $364M | $356M | $9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $6M | $18M | $18M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $318M | $383M | $374M | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.75x | -0.67x | 0.24x | 1.54x | 9.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs EP's -30.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 35.7% vs EP's -33.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.9% | +68.0% | +2682.5% | +52.9% | +32.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.6% | +65.5% | +1505.8% | +134.2% | +61.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.9% | -68.3% | +150.0% | +135.9% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.8% | -72.8% | +385.2% | +158.4% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +705.9% | -97.6% | -62.3% | +26.6% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.0% | -31.8% | +35.7% | +33.1% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs EP's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 0.52x | 3.21x | 1.09x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.31 | $4.06 | $10.23 | $17.95 | $57.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.65 | $1.46 | $0.00 | $7.20 | $31.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.4% | +80.3% | +96.3% | +93.7% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.7 | 56.9 | 82.9 | 69.4 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 87K | 307K | 125K | 1.7M | 16.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NINE as "Hold", WTTR as "Buy", SLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs WTTR's 1.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | $16.00 | $56.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | 14 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.32 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
SLB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KLXE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EP vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR vs SLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 22. 6x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, SLB N. V. is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EP returned +685. 3% versus KLXE's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
(KLXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 523% more volatile than KLXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 45% for SLB N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SLB N.
V. (SLB) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nine Energy Service, Inc. grew EPS -12. 6% year-over-year, compared to -292. 6% for Empire Petroleum Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -210. 7% for Empire Petroleum Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus -58. 6% for EP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLXE leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SLB N.
V. (SLB) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 21. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB?
In this comparison, SLB (2.
0% yield), WTTR (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. EP, KLXE, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EP or KLXE or NINE or WTTR or SLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 0% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLB: -9. 2%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EP and KLXE and NINE and WTTR and SLB?
These companies operate in different sectors (EP (Energy) and KLXE (Energy) and NINE (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and SLB (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR, SLB pay a dividend while EP, KLXE, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.