EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$1.88B
5Y Perf.+98.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EPAC vs KMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Market Cap$3.18B
5Y Perf.+50.3%
EPAC vs KMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EPAC | KMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $1.88B | $3.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $616M | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $90M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.2% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $228M | $643M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $141M |
EPAC vs KMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EPAC
KMT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enerpac Tool Group … (EPAC) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
| Kennametal Inc. (KMT) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPAC vs KMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EPAC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Kennametal Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
The Growth Play
EPAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 52.5%, current ratio 2.74x
- Beta 1.10, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.74x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
The Income Pick
KMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.9%
- 120.9% 10Y total return vs EPAC's 40.3%
- Lower P/E (17.1x vs 18.8x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EPAC | 4.6% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9% |
| Value | KMT | Lower P/E (17.1x vs 18.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | EPAC | 14.6% margin vs KMT's 6.4% |
| Stability / Safety | EPAC | Beta 1.10 vs KMT's 1.31 |
| Dividends | KMT | 1.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EPAC's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | KMT | +115.0% vs EPAC's -14.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EPAC | 11.0% ROA vs KMT's 5.3%, ROIC 21.7% vs 5.9% |
EPAC vs KMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
EPAC vs KMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEPACLAGGINGKMT
KMTKennametal Inc.
2leads
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Co…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KMTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EPAC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EPAC7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KMT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
KMT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 3.5x EPAC's $616M. EPAC is the more profitable business, keeping 14.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMT's 6.4%. On growth, KMT holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $616M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $147M | $238M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $90M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $102M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | +82.9% |
EPAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EPAC and KMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.9x trailing earnings, EPAC trades at a 40% valuation discount to KMT's 34.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EPAC's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KMT's 13.2x.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.91x | 34.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.75x | 17.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.59x | 13.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.46x | 2.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.40x | 26.62x |
Evenly matched — EPAC and KMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPAC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPAC delivers a 20.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $10 for KMT. KMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EPAC's 0.53x.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.9% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.0% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.7% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $76M | $503M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $141M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $228M | $643M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.59x | 5.29x |
EPAC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPAC five years ago would be worth $12,602 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,928 for KMT. Over the past 12 months, KMT leads with a +115.0% total return vs EPAC's -14.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KMT at 17.9% vs EPAC's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | +44.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.7% | +115.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.7% | +63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.0% | +9.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | +120.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +17.9% |
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPAC and KMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KMT currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs EPAC's 76.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.39 | $43.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.66 | $17.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.6% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 375K | 1.3M |
Evenly matched — EPAC and KMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EPAC as "Hold" and KMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.1% upside for EPAC (target: $37) vs -13.6% for KMT (target: $36). For income investors, KMT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.90% vs EPAC's 0.11%.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +1.9% |
KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EPAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallEnerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EPAC vs KMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPAC or KMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPAC or KMT?
On trailing P/E, Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is the cheapest at 20. 9x versus Kennametal Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, Kennametal Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPAC or KMT?
Over the past 5 years, Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) delivered a total return of +26. 0%, compared to +9. 3% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KMT returned +120. 9% versus EPAC's +40. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPAC or KMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Kennametal Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning KMT is approximately 20% more volatile than EPAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kennametal Inc. (KMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 53% for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPAC or KMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enerpac Tool Group Corp. grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 4% for Kennametal Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPAC leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPAC or KMT?
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 0% net margin versus 4. 7% for Kennametal Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPAC leads at 22. 6% versus 7. 3% for KMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EPAC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPAC or KMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) trades at 17. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPAC: 4. 1% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPAC or KMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kennametal Inc. (KMT) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 0. 1% for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC).
09Is EPAC or KMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 9% yield, +120. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KMT: +120. 9%, EPAC: +40. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPAC and KMT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KMT pays a dividend while EPAC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EPAC: -0.7% · KMT: 21.8%)Net Margin>
%
(EPAC: 14.6% · KMT: 6.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(EPAC: 20.9x · KMT: 34.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.