Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EPM vs TPVG vs PED vs CIVI vs BATL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
EPM vs TPVG vs PED vs CIVI vs BATL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Asset Management | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $165M | $243M | $64M | $2.34B | $47M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $97M | $33M | $4.71B | $165M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-12M | $10M | $638M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 83.5% | 14.4% | 43.9% | 72.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 77.9% | -12.4% | 31.1% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 50.5x | 6.5x | 3.5x | 6.8x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $469M | $228K | $4.49B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $20M | $4M | $76M | $28M |
EPM vs TPVG vs PED vs CIVI vs BATL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evolution Petroleum… (EPM) | 100 | 193.0 | +93.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| PEDEVCO Corp. (PED) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 160.3 | +60.3% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPM vs TPVG vs PED vs CIVI vs BATL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 10.4%
- 69.4% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 52.3%, current ratio 0.81x
- Beta 0.38, yield 10.4%, current ratio 0.81x
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 50.6% margin vs EPM's 3.6%
PED has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and efficiency.
- Lower P/E (3.5x vs 6.5x)
- 6.9% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 3.5% vs 7.2%
CIVI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- PEG 0.32 vs TPVG's 6.41
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
BATL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs EPM's 10.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 6.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs EPM's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs EPM's 10.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 3.5% vs 7.2% |
EPM vs TPVG vs PED vs CIVI vs BATL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EPM vs TPVG vs PED vs CIVI vs BATL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories
BATL leads 1 • EPM leads 0 • PED leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 141.5x PED's $33M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPM's 3.6%. On growth, EPM holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $97M | $33M | $4.7B | $165M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | -$22M | $12M | $3.4B | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$12M | $10M | $638M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $35M | $17M | $934M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +83.5% | +14.4% | +43.9% | +72.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +77.9% | -12.4% | +31.1% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +50.6% | +28.8% | +13.6% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | -58.7% | +51.3% | +19.8% | +23.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | — | -23.1% | -8.1% | -37.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.2% | -2.3% | -110.7% | -33.9% | +59.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CIVI and BATL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 98% valuation discount to EPM's 141.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CIVI offers better value at 0.15x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165M | $243M | $64M | $2.3B | $47M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $691M | $60M | $6.8B | $42M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 141.87x | 4.91x | 3.46x | 3.24x | -1.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.48x | 6.50x | — | 6.75x | 12.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.64x | 9.13x | 2.89x | 1.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 2.50x | 1.61x | 0.45x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.19x | 0.68x | 0.51x | 0.41x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.45x | — | 5.06x | 2.61x | 1.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PED and CIVI and BATL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. PED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs CIVI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.6% | -3.4% | +8.0% | +9.5% | +14.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -1.5% | +6.9% | +4.2% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +7.2% | +3.5% | +10.8% | -3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +9.4% | +4.0% | +12.1% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 1.33x | 0.00x | 0.68x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35M | $449M | -$4M | $4.4B | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $20M | $4M | $76M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $469M | $228,000 | $4.5B | $23M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.40x | -1.02x | -32.41x | 2.80x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPM five years ago would be worth $17,855 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs CIVI's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.2% vs BATL's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.7% | -6.3% | +23.9% | -1.5% | +140.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.5% | +19.3% | +30.1% | +6.8% | +128.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.8% | -3.4% | -20.8% | -41.7% | -54.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.6% | -13.5% | -49.6% | +31.9% | -77.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.4% | +93.3% | -67.1% | -86.2% | -72.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.6% | -1.2% | -7.5% | -16.5% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPM and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EPM currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.83x | -0.82x | 1.10x | -1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.70 | $7.53 | $18.89 | $37.45 | $29.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.19 | $4.48 | $0.58 | $25.38 | $1.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +79.5% | +73.2% | +73.1% | +9.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 58.3 | 44.2 | 54.8 | 37.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 402K | 504K | 47K | 22.4M | 16.6M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EPM as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", PED as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", BATL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -82.6% for PED (target: $2). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs EPM's 10.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.15 | $8.95 | $2.40 | $31.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 12 | 2 | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.4% | +17.1% | — | +18.2% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $1.02 | — | $4.98 | $2.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BATL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
EPM vs TPVG vs PED vs CIVI vs BATL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Evolution Petroleum Corporation at 141. 9x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Civitas Resources, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL?
Over the past 5 years, Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) delivered a total return of +78.
6%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +93. 3% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately -164% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PEDEVCO Corp. (PED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PEDEVCO Corp. grew EPS 65. 7% year-over-year, compared to -72. 3% for Evolution Petroleum Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 1. 7% for Evolution Petroleum Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 50. 5x for Evolution Petroleum Corporation — 44. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), TPVG (17. 1% yield), EPM (10. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PED does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EPM or TPVG or PED or CIVI or BATL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPM and TPVG and PED and CIVI and BATL?
These companies operate in different sectors (EPM (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services) and PED (Energy) and CIVI (Energy) and BATL (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EPM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; PED is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. EPM, TPVG, CIVI, BATL pay a dividend while PED does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.