Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EPOW vs BEEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
EPOW vs BEEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Solar |
| Market Cap | $21M | $35M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $28M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-29M |
| Gross Margin | -12.9% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | -108.4% |
| Total Debt | $50M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $5M |
EPOW vs BEEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunrise New Energy … (EPOW) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| Beam Global (BEEM) | 100 | 4.5 | -95.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPOW vs BEEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPOW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.34
- Rev growth 44.3%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, current ratio 0.73x
BEEM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -76.5% 10Y total return vs EPOW's -85.4%
- +32.2% vs EPOW's -14.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.3% revenue growth vs BEEM's -26.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -27.8% margin vs BEEM's -105.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs BEEM's 2.69 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.2% vs EPOW's -14.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -18.6% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC -16.8% vs -22.1% |
EPOW vs BEEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EPOW vs BEEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $117M annually — 4.2x BEEM's $28M. EPOW is the more profitable business, keeping -27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEEM's -105.9%. On growth, EPOW holds the edge at +25.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $28M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +15.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.1% | -108.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.8% | -105.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.5% | -24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.5% | -49.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.8% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BEEM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $35M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $70M | $33M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.72x | -2.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEEM delivers a -110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-110 in annual profit, vs $-129 for EPOW. BEEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EPOW's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EPOW scores 5/9 vs BEEM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -128.8% | -110.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | -65.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.8% | -22.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.3% | -21.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.16x | -715.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EPOW and BEEM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPOW five years ago would be worth $2,525 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $607 for BEEM. Over the past 12 months, BEEM leads with a +32.2% total return vs EPOW's -14.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EPOW at -26.3% vs BEEM's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.2% | +16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.8% | +32.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | -80.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.4% | -76.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | -42.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPOW and BEEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEEM's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEEM currently trades 46.8% from its 52-week high vs EPOW's 41.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 2.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.86 | $4.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $1.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.7% | +46.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.0 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 483K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BEEM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). EPOW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
EPOW vs BEEM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPOW or BEEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the stronger pick with 44. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EPOW or BEEM?
Over the past 5 years, Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) delivered a total return of -74. 7%, compared to -93. 9% for Beam Global (BEEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEEM returned -76. 5% versus EPOW's -85. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EPOW or BEEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Beam Global's 2. 69β — meaning BEEM is approximately 698% more volatile than EPOW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beam Global (BEEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 185% for Sunrise New Energy Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EPOW or BEEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is pulling ahead at 44. 3% versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrise New Energy Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 52. 6% year-over-year, compared to 40. 8% for Beam Global. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPOW leads at 106. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EPOW or BEEM?
Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the more profitable company, earning -18. 1% net margin versus -22. 9% for Beam Global — meaning it keeps -18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEEM leads at -23. 6% versus -25. 5% for EPOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEEM leads at 14. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EPOW or BEEM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is EPOW or BEEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Beam Global (BEEM) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPOW: -85. 4%, BEEM: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EPOW and BEEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (EPOW (Industrials) and BEEM (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EPOW is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.