Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EPOW vs LI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
EPOW vs LI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $18M | $35.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $125.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $4.51B |
| Gross Margin | -12.9% | 19.4% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $16.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $65.90B |
EPOW vs LI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunrise New Energy … (EPOW) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| Li Auto Inc. (LI) | 100 | 69.4 | -30.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPOW vs LI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPOW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.34
- Rev growth 44.3%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, current ratio 0.73x
LI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs EPOW's -87.2%
- 3.6% margin vs EPOW's -27.8%
- 2.8% ROA vs EPOW's -18.6%, ROIC 209.3% vs -16.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.3% revenue growth vs LI's 16.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs EPOW's -27.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs LI's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.3% vs LI's -31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs EPOW's -18.6%, ROIC 209.3% vs -16.8% |
EPOW vs LI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EPOW vs LI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.7B annually — 1071.7x EPOW's $117M. LI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPOW's -27.8%. On growth, EPOW holds the edge at +25.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $125.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $5.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +19.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.1% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.8% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.5% | -6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.5% | -36.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.8% | -123.3% |
Valuation Metrics
EPOW leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $35.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67M | $28.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.51x | 16.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LI leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LI delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-129 for EPOW. LI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EPOW's 1.85x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -128.8% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.8% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.3% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | -$49.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $65.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $16.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.16x | 28.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LI five years ago would be worth $9,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,278 for EPOW. Over the past 12 months, EPOW leads with a -25.3% total return vs LI's -31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LI at -10.5% vs EPOW's -29.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.7% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.3% | -31.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.9% | -28.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.2% | -1.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +7.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.5% | -10.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPOW and LI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LI's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LI currently trades 55.3% from its 52-week high vs EPOW's 36.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.86 | $32.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $15.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.6% | +55.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 176K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.01 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EPOW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EPOW vs LI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPOW or LI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the stronger pick with 44. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 7% for Li Auto Inc. (LI). Li Auto Inc. (LI) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Li Auto Inc. (LI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EPOW or LI?
Over the past 5 years, Li Auto Inc.
(LI) delivered a total return of -1. 5%, compared to -77. 2% for Sunrise New Energy Co. , Ltd. (EPOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LI returned +6. 9% versus EPOW's -85. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EPOW or LI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Li Auto Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning LI is approximately 181% more volatile than EPOW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Li Auto Inc. (LI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 185% for Sunrise New Energy Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EPOW or LI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is pulling ahead at 44. 3% versus 16. 7% for Li Auto Inc. (LI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrise New Energy Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 52. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Li Auto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPOW leads at 106. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EPOW or LI?
Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -18. 1% for Sunrise New Energy Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LI leads at 4. 4% versus -25. 5% for EPOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LI leads at 20. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EPOW or LI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is EPOW or LI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPOW: -85. 4%, LI: +6. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EPOW and LI?
These companies operate in different sectors (EPOW (Industrials) and LI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.