Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EPSN vs SOC vs CIVI vs VTLE vs BATL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
EPSN vs SOC vs CIVI vs VTLE vs BATL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $130M | $1.84T | $2.34B | $693M | $47M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $1M | $4.71B | $1.90B | $165M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-498M | $638M | $-1.31B | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | -8.7% | 43.9% | 44.2% | 72.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | -367.6% | 31.1% | -58.3% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 7.5x | 6.8x | 4.0x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $477K | $0.00 | $4.49B | $2.55B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $98M | $76M | $40M | $28M |
EPSN vs SOC vs CIVI vs VTLE vs BATL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 44.2 | -55.8% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 23.8 | -76.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPSN vs SOC vs CIVI vs VTLE vs BATL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPSN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.02x
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.02x
- Beta 0.15 vs SOC's 1.51
- 4.7% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 2.9% vs -44.6%
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs EPSN's -66.9%
CIVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
- 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
VTLE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.8x)
BATL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -1.71, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs EPSN's 4.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +128.8% vs SOC's -36.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs EPSN's 4.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 2.9% vs -44.6% |
EPSN vs SOC vs CIVI vs VTLE vs BATL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EPSN vs SOC vs CIVI vs VTLE vs BATL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EPSN leads in 2 of 6 categories
VTLE leads 1 • BATL leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EPSN and CIVI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 3702.4x SOC's $1M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, EPSN holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $1M | $4.7B | $1.9B | $165M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | -$454M | $3.4B | -$334M | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$498M | $638M | -$1.3B | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$611M | $934M | $656M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | -8.7% | +43.9% | +44.2% | +72.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | -367.6% | +31.1% | -58.3% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | -391.5% | +13.6% | -69.3% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | -480.4% | +19.8% | +34.6% | +23.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.2% | — | -8.1% | -8.4% | -37.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -5.4% | -33.9% | -2.6% | +59.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 95% valuation discount to EPSN's 66.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EPSN's 9.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $130M | $1.84T | $2.3B | $693M | $47M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $124M | $1.84T | $6.8B | $3.2B | $42M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 66.89x | -3.07x | 3.24x | -3.78x | -1.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.29x | 7.50x | 6.75x | 3.98x | 12.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | — | 1.89x | 4.46x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.11x | — | 0.45x | 0.36x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 2359.43x | 0.41x | 0.24x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 2.61x | — | 1.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EPSN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. EPSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTLE's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -113.8% | +9.5% | -74.8% | +14.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | -28.9% | +4.2% | -27.9% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | -44.6% | +10.8% | -0.3% | -3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | -37.5% | +12.1% | -0.5% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 0.68x | 0.95x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$98M | $4.4B | $2.5B | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $98M | $76M | $40M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $476,911 | $0 | $4.5B | $2.6B | $23M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 157.74x | -2.28x | 2.80x | -5.04x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EPSN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPSN five years ago would be worth $17,622 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EPSN at 8.5% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.2% | +9.5% | -1.5% | — | +140.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.7% | -36.8% | +6.8% | +28.7% | +128.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | +26.5% | -41.7% | -59.0% | -54.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.2% | +32.6% | +31.9% | -51.9% | -77.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.9% | +32.4% | -86.2% | -92.1% | -72.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | +8.2% | -16.5% | -25.7% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VTLE and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTLE currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 1.51x | 1.10x | 1.32x | -1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $35.00 | $37.45 | $22.10 | $29.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $3.72 | $25.38 | $13.65 | $1.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.2% | +36.7% | +73.1% | +81.1% | +9.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 45.8 | 54.8 | 53.2 | 37.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 246K | 5.4M | 22.4M | 17 | 16.6M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SOC as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", VTLE as "Hold", BATL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs EPSN's 4.25%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.40 | $27.00 | $31.00 | $23.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 16 | 36 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | — | +18.2% | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | — | $4.98 | — | $2.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% | +18.3% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
EPSN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VTLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EPSN vs SOC vs CIVI vs VTLE vs BATL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Epsilon Energy Ltd. at 66. 9x. On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL?
Over the past 5 years, Epsilon Energy Ltd.
(EPSN) delivered a total return of +76. 2%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus VTLE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -189% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Epsilon Energy Ltd. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), EPSN (4. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SOC, VTLE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EPSN or SOC or CIVI or VTLE or BATL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPSN and SOC and CIVI and VTLE and BATL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EPSN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. EPSN, CIVI, BATL pay a dividend while SOC, VTLE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.