Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EPSN vs WMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
EPSN vs WMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $131M | $90.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $11.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $2.84B |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 62.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 31.2x |
| Total Debt | $477K | $29.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $63M |
EPSN vs WMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) | 100 | 202.1 | +102.1% |
| The Williams Compan… (WMB) | 100 | 357.1 | +257.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPSN vs WMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPSN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.02x
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.02x
WMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
- 357.0% 10Y total return vs EPSN's -83.3%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs EPSN's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs EPSN's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.3x vs 31.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs EPSN's 12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs WMB's 0.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMB's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.1% vs EPSN's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs EPSN's 4.7%, ROIC 7.7% vs 2.9% |
EPSN vs WMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EPSN vs WMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.9B annually — 260.8x EPSN's $46M. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPSN's 12.9%. On growth, EPSN holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $11.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $722M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +62.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.2% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EPSN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.5x trailing earnings, WMB trades at a 49% valuation discount to EPSN's 67.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EPSN's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMB's 17.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $90.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $125M | $119.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 67.69x | 34.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.29x | 31.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.20x | 17.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 7.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 89.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMB delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for EPSN. EPSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMB's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMB scores 7/9 vs EPSN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $29.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $476,911 | $29.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 157.74x | 3.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMB five years ago would be worth $33,202 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,710 for EPSN. Over the past 12 months, WMB leads with a +29.1% total return vs EPSN's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMB at 39.1% vs EPSN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.7% | +22.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.3% | +29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | +169.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.1% | +232.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +357.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +39.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPSN is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMB's 0.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMB currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs EPSN's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $77.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $55.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 66.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 244K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 41.2% upside for EPSN (target: $8) vs 7.1% for WMB (target: $79). For income investors, EPSN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.20% vs WMB's 2.71%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.40 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% |
WMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EPSN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
EPSN vs WMB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPSN or WMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN). The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) offers the better valuation at 34. 5x trailing P/E (31. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPSN or WMB?
On trailing P/E, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the cheapest at 34. 5x versus Epsilon Energy Ltd. at 67. 7x. On forward P/E, Epsilon Energy Ltd. is actually cheaper at 17. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPSN or WMB?
Over the past 5 years, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) delivered a total return of +232. 0%, compared to +77. 1% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +371. 1% versus EPSN's -66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPSN or WMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Epsilon Energy Ltd.
(EPSN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus The Williams Companies, Inc. 's 0. 17β — meaning WMB is approximately 13% more volatile than EPSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPSN or WMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus 2. 6% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Williams Companies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -71. 6% for Epsilon Energy Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMB leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPSN or WMB?
The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 6. 1% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 10. 9% for EPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMB leads at 42. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPSN or WMB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Epsilon Energy Ltd.
(EPSN) trades at 17. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPSN: 41. 2% to $8. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPSN or WMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 7% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).
09Is EPSN or WMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 2. 7% yield, +371. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMB: +371. 1%, EPSN: -66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPSN and WMB?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EPSN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.