Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EPSN vs WMB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EPSN
Epsilon Energy Ltd.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$131M
5Y Perf.+102.1%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$90.21B
5Y Perf.+257.1%

EPSN vs WMB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EPSN logoEPSN
WMB logoWMB
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$131M$90.21B
Revenue (TTM)$46M$11.92B
Net Income (TTM)$6M$2.84B
Gross Margin47.6%62.8%
Operating Margin21.9%38.8%
Forward P/E17.3x31.2x
Total Debt$477K$29.36B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$63M

EPSN vs WMBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EPSN
WMB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN)100202.1+102.1%
The Williams Compan… (WMB)100357.1+257.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EPSN vs WMB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WMB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Epsilon Energy Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EPSN
Epsilon Energy Ltd.
The Income Pick

EPSN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 4.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.02x
  • Beta 0.15, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.02x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
The Growth Play

WMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • 357.0% 10Y total return vs EPSN's -83.3%
  • 13.8% revenue growth vs EPSN's 2.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWMB logoWMB13.8% revenue growth vs EPSN's 2.6%
ValueEPSN logoEPSNLower P/E (17.3x vs 31.2x)
Quality / MarginsWMB logoWMB23.8% margin vs EPSN's 12.9%
Stability / SafetyEPSN logoEPSNBeta 0.15 vs WMB's 0.17, lower leverage
DividendsEPSN logoEPSN4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMB's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)WMB logoWMB+29.1% vs EPSN's -5.3%
Efficiency (ROA)WMB logoWMB4.9% ROA vs EPSN's 4.7%, ROIC 7.7% vs 2.9%

EPSN vs WMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EPSNEpsilon Energy Ltd.
FY 2024
Oil and Condensate
45.7%$14M
Natural Gas
35.9%$11M
Gas Gathering And Compression
18.4%$6M
WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Gas & NGL Marketing Services
71.6%$7.2B
West
28.4%$2.8B

EPSN vs WMB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWMBLAGGINGEPSN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.9B annually — 260.8x EPSN's $46M. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPSN's 12.9%. On growth, EPSN holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEPSN logoEPSNEpsilon Energy Lt…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$46M$11.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$22M$6.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M$2.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$722M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.6%+62.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.9%+38.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.9%+23.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.7%+6.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.2%-0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.0%+24.6%
Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EPSN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 34.5x trailing earnings, WMB trades at a 49% valuation discount to EPSN's 67.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EPSN's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMB's 17.7x.

MetricEPSN logoEPSNEpsilon Energy Lt…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
Market CapShares × price$131M$90.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$125M$119.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS67.69x34.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.29x31.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.20x17.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.16x7.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.35x6.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF89.76x
EPSN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

WMB delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for EPSN. EPSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMB's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMB scores 7/9 vs EPSN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEPSN logoEPSNEpsilon Energy Lt…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.9%+19.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.7%+4.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.9%+7.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.0%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x1.96x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6M$29.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$63M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$476,911$29.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense157.74x3.37x
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WMB five years ago would be worth $33,202 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,710 for EPSN. Over the past 12 months, WMB leads with a +29.1% total return vs EPSN's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMB at 39.1% vs EPSN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEPSN logoEPSNEpsilon Energy Lt…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.7%+22.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.3%+29.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+29.1%+169.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.1%+232.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.3%+357.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.9%+39.1%
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EPSN is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMB's 0.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMB currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs EPSN's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEPSN logoEPSNEpsilon Energy Lt…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.15x0.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.50$77.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.20$55.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.0%+95.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.766.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded244K5.8M
Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Consensus price targets imply 41.2% upside for EPSN (target: $8) vs 7.1% for WMB (target: $79). For income investors, EPSN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.20% vs WMB's 2.71%.

MetricEPSN logoEPSNEpsilon Energy Lt…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.40$79.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts34
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.2%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises18
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.25$2.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.4%0.0%
Evenly matched — EPSN and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EPSN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallThe Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EPSN vs WMB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EPSN or WMB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN). The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) offers the better valuation at 34. 5x trailing P/E (31. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EPSN or WMB?

On trailing P/E, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the cheapest at 34. 5x versus Epsilon Energy Ltd. at 67. 7x. On forward P/E, Epsilon Energy Ltd. is actually cheaper at 17. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EPSN or WMB?

Over the past 5 years, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) delivered a total return of +232. 0%, compared to +77. 1% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +371. 1% versus EPSN's -66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EPSN or WMB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Epsilon Energy Ltd.

(EPSN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus The Williams Companies, Inc. 's 0. 17β — meaning WMB is approximately 13% more volatile than EPSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EPSN or WMB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus 2. 6% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Williams Companies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -71. 6% for Epsilon Energy Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMB leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EPSN or WMB?

The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 6. 1% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 10. 9% for EPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMB leads at 42. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EPSN or WMB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Epsilon Energy Ltd.

(EPSN) trades at 17. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPSN: 41. 2% to $8. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EPSN or WMB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 7% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).

09

Is EPSN or WMB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 2. 7% yield, +371. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMB: +371. 1%, EPSN: -66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EPSN and WMB?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: EPSN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

EPSN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EPSN and WMB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EPSN: 23.2% · WMB: -0.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(EPSN: 12.9% · WMB: 23.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(EPSN: 67.7x · WMB: 34.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.