Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EQ vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
EQ vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $271M | $6.75B | $3.08B | $397.56B | $63.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $416M | $61.16B | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-506M | $-2M | $4.23B | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 90.9% | 70.2% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 0.8% | 26.7% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 122.5x | 16.0x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $719K | $72K | $6M | $69.07B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $902M | $43M | $5.23B | $3.12B |
EQ vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equillium, Inc. (EQ) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 232.0 | +132.0% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 98.2 | -1.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQ vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
- +6.3% vs REGN's +18.6%
Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 2.9%
- 357.3% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
- Beta 0.15, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.15 vs IMVT's 1.67
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 16.0x)
- 29.6% margin vs ARQT's -0.6%
- 11.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs ARQT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs IMVT's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs REGN's +18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
EQ vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EQ vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • EQ leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • ARQT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARQT's -0.6%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $416M | $61.2B | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$532M | $6M | $24.5B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$506M | -$2M | $4.2B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$407M | $27M | $18.7B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +90.9% | +70.2% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +0.8% | +26.7% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -0.6% | +6.9% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +6.5% | +30.6% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +60.1% | +10.0% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.0% | -14.1% | +55.0% | +57.4% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 84% valuation discount to ABBV's 94.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, REGN's 15.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 16.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $6.8B | $3.1B | $397.6B | $63.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $5.8B | $3.0B | $461.4B | $63.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.21x | -11.87x | -189.15x | 94.84x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 122.45x | 15.96x | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 16.34x | 15.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 8.18x | 6.50x | 4.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.03x | 7.04x | 16.51x | — | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 22.32x | 15.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REGN's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs EQ's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.4% | -68.2% | -1.4% | +62.1% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.7% | -62.2% | -0.6% | +3.1% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.8% | — | -5.2% | +23.9% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.1% | -68.3% | -4.3% | +21.5% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.00x | 0.03x | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$902M | -$37M | $63.8B | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $902M | $43M | $5.2B | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $719,000 | $72,000 | $6M | $69.1B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 2.08x | 3.28x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,584 for EQ. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +628.0% total return vs REGN's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs REGN's -6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +83.7% | +26.9% | -15.2% | -0.5% | -21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +628.0% | +103.6% | +79.1% | +20.9% | +18.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +295.8% | +51.6% | +140.8% | +77.1% | -18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | +207.0% | -13.3% | +121.1% | +17.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.9% | +230.5% | +12.8% | +357.3% | +68.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.2% | +14.9% | +34.0% | +21.0% | -6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABBV currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs REGN's 74.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.66x | 1.45x | 0.14x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.43 | $36.27 | $31.77 | $244.81 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $14.32 | $12.72 | $181.73 | $503.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +90.6% | +77.4% | +91.8% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 51.9 | 59.9 | 63.2 | 33.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 559K | 1.9M | 1.5M | 4.6M | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.4% upside for EQ (target: $6) vs 14.3% for ABBV (target: $257). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs REGN's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.25 | $43.67 | $34.00 | $256.92 | $836.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 23 | 12 | 41 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.9% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 43 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $6.57 | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +6.2% |
ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). REGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
EQ vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus AbbVie Inc. at 94. 8x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -54. 2% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +362. 2% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 1118% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -69. 6% for Equillium, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 109. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQ: 122. 4% to $6. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. EQ, IMVT, ARQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EQ or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 9% yield, +362. 2% 10Y return). Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +362. 2%, IMVT: +237. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQ and IMVT and ARQT and ABBV and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ABBV, REGN pay a dividend while EQ, IMVT, ARQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.